2018
DOI: 10.1007/s41237-018-0065-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring an intelligent tutoring system as a conversation-based assessment tool for reading comprehension

Abstract: Reading comprehension is often assessed by having students read passages and administering a test that assesses their understanding of the text. Shorter assessments may fail to give a full picture of comprehension ability while more thorough ones can be time consuming and costly. This study used data from a conversational intelligent tutoring system (AutoTutor) to assess reading comprehension ability in 52 low-literacy adults who interacted with the system. We analyzed participants' accuracy and time spent ans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) have been increasingly used in literary education during the past two decades. Traditionally, a reading process consists of pre-reading, during reading, and post-reading activities, and intelligent reading tutoring systems built on this principle are often organized reading units that contain pre-assessment, warmup activities for comprehension guides, comprehension practice, and multiple-choice questions for post-assessment (Jones et al, 2004 ) or enhance the interactions during a reading with cooperative dialogs in natural languages (Shi et al, 2018 ; Afzal et al, 2019a , b ). However, the lessons in these reading ITS are fixed, which limits their applications in the reading comprehension courses that must meet the diverse requirements of readers at different proficiency levels.…”
Section: Literature Review: Reading Models and Computer Technology In...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) have been increasingly used in literary education during the past two decades. Traditionally, a reading process consists of pre-reading, during reading, and post-reading activities, and intelligent reading tutoring systems built on this principle are often organized reading units that contain pre-assessment, warmup activities for comprehension guides, comprehension practice, and multiple-choice questions for post-assessment (Jones et al, 2004 ) or enhance the interactions during a reading with cooperative dialogs in natural languages (Shi et al, 2018 ; Afzal et al, 2019a , b ). However, the lessons in these reading ITS are fixed, which limits their applications in the reading comprehension courses that must meet the diverse requirements of readers at different proficiency levels.…”
Section: Literature Review: Reading Models and Computer Technology In...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each lesson was assigned a measure of the relevance to one to three of the four theoretical levels according to the extent to which the level was targeted in this lesson. The assigned codes were primary, secondary, tertiary or no relevance of a component to a lesson, corresponding to a relevance score of 1.00, 0.67, 0.33 and 0.00 respectively ( Shi et al, 2018 ). In this study, we simply consider the primary theoretical level that characterizes the lesson.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tool is widely used for evaluation of writing quality (Zedelius et al, 2019;Macarthur et al, 2019), writing ability (Perin and Lauterbach, 2018) and cognitive understanding (Wiley et al, 2017). Some researchers have also proposed new text analysis methods based on Coh-Metrix tools (Wolfe et al, 2019) or developed new application platforms (Shi et al, 2018;McNamara et al, 2013). In addition, relevant researchers have carried out some research on the measurement of text readability and complexity (Tortorelli, 2020;Spencer et al, 2019), which also provides some valuable guidance and reference for the selection of method in this paper.…”
Section: Coh-metrix Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%