2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring association between certified EHRs adoption and patient experience in U.S. psychiatric hospitals

Abstract: Objective Certified Electronic Health Records (EHR) have been shown to improve the health service quality in some health settings, but there is scant evidence related to its adoption in psychiatric hospitals. This paper aimed to examine the relationship between certified EHR adoption and patient experience across psychiatric hospitals in the United States.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is some evidence that EHRs can improve service users’ experience of integrated care. Hu et al [ 90 ] found that EHR adoption was significantly associated with improved service user experience for "care transition" and "discharge information" in psychiatric hospitals. Jetelina et al [ 110 ] also found a significant improvement in service users’ perceptions of integrated care after the implementation of a mental health–specific EHR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is some evidence that EHRs can improve service users’ experience of integrated care. Hu et al [ 90 ] found that EHR adoption was significantly associated with improved service user experience for "care transition" and "discharge information" in psychiatric hospitals. Jetelina et al [ 110 ] also found a significant improvement in service users’ perceptions of integrated care after the implementation of a mental health–specific EHR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most were quantitative (21/40, 53%) [ 78 - 98 ], with qualitative (11/40, 28%) [ 99 - 109 ] and mixed method studies (8/40, 20%) [ 110 - 117 ] also included. We categorized studies based on the broad category of research methods, including surveys (15/40, 38%) [ 78 , 80 - 85 , 89 , 92 , 95 - 97 , 110 , 113 , 116 ], qualitative interview/focus group studies (7/40, 18%) [ 100 - 104 , 110 , 111 ], chart review of specific EHRs (5/40, 13%) [ 85 - 87 , 114 , 117 ], cross-sectional analysis of EHR data or comparison with other secondary data (5/40, 13%) [ 90 , 91 , 93 , 95 , 98 ], quality improvement initiatives (3/40, 8%) [ 79 , 88 , 111 ], ethnographic or observational (6/40, 15%) [ 99 , 105 - 108 , 112 ], and descriptive case studies (1/40, 3%) [ 109 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…System affiliation (Hu et al, 2020) Bed size (Hu et al, 2020) Teaching status (Hu et al, 2020) Care Transition (n = 2 studies)…”
Section: Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advanced practice provider/care pathways (Broman, 2021) Certified electronic health records (Hu et al, 2020) Structure Rural status (Hu et al, 2020) Nonprofit (Hu et al, 2020)…”
Section: Processmentioning
confidence: 99%