2023
DOI: 10.1177/13623613231181732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring camouflaging by the Chinese version Camouflaging Autistic Traits Questionnaire in Taiwanese autistic and non-autistic adolescents: An initial development

Abstract: Camouflaging is a strategy adopted by neurodivergent individuals to cope in neurotypical social contexts, likely related to perceived stress. Despite increasing research in autistic adults, studies of camouflaging in adolescents remain sparse. The self-reported Camouflaging Autistic Traits Questionnaire has been validated in adults in some Western societies, but not in non-Western populations. We examined the psychometric properties of the self-reported and caregiver-reported Chinese version Camouflaging Autis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CAT‐Q has been validated with autistic and non‐autistic adults in the UK and with university students in Italy, with good internal consistency and validity (Dell'Osso et al, 2022; Hull et al, 2019), while the Dutch and French versions have good reliability but poor measurement consistency across autistic and non‐autistic adults (Bureau et al, 2023; Van Der Putten et al, 2023). The Taiwanese version was validated with autistic and non‐autistic child‐adolescents and their caregivers; it had a two‐factor factor structure of compensation‐masking and assimilation, as well as good reliability (Liu et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CAT‐Q has been validated with autistic and non‐autistic adults in the UK and with university students in Italy, with good internal consistency and validity (Dell'Osso et al, 2022; Hull et al, 2019), while the Dutch and French versions have good reliability but poor measurement consistency across autistic and non‐autistic adults (Bureau et al, 2023; Van Der Putten et al, 2023). The Taiwanese version was validated with autistic and non‐autistic child‐adolescents and their caregivers; it had a two‐factor factor structure of compensation‐masking and assimilation, as well as good reliability (Liu et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%