2013
DOI: 10.1002/crq.21073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Communities of Facilitators: Orientations toward Restorative Justice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the more prominent examples of such practices is the victim‐offender conference (VOC). VOCs, which are managed by a neutral facilitator, bring together victims, offenders, and their supporters following an offense (typically a low‐level offense committed by a first‐time offending youth) to talk directly with each other about the harm done, negotiate reparation for that harm, and work through what any future relationship between them could look like (Dignan et al ; Paul ; Paul and Borton ; Paul and Dunlop ; Umbreit ; Zehr ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the more prominent examples of such practices is the victim‐offender conference (VOC). VOCs, which are managed by a neutral facilitator, bring together victims, offenders, and their supporters following an offense (typically a low‐level offense committed by a first‐time offending youth) to talk directly with each other about the harm done, negotiate reparation for that harm, and work through what any future relationship between them could look like (Dignan et al ; Paul ; Paul and Borton ; Paul and Dunlop ; Umbreit ; Zehr ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another innovative area of inquiry in this second wave of research on victim‐offender mediation (and other forms of restorative justice practice) could also consider the perspectives of mediators themselves and the effects that their work has on them. For instance, in their research, Paul and Borton () illustrate that restorative justice mediators/facilitators can have different perspectives on outcomes, process, and participants, resulting in four distinct orientations: advocacy, counseling, healing, and peacemaking. In another study focusing on the role of the mediator, Helenek and Downs () use autoethnographic reflection to conclude that “the application of restorative justice makes a major difference in our own lives, and in the lives of those around us” (p. 299).…”
Section: Discussion: Findings Disparities Concerns and The Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For victims, RJ advocates assert that conventional justice processes are insufficient and perhaps revictimizing and that RJ processes are more effective at promoting individual and relational restoration (Paul & Borton, 2013;Wenzel, Okimoto, Feather, & Platow, 2008;Zehr, 2002). Individual restoration typically comes in the form of tangible/material repair through restitution and intangible/ emotional repair through a renewed sense of closure, safety, and satisfaction (Armour & Umbreit, 2006;Braithwaite, 2002;Chapman & Chapman, 2016;Umbreit, 2001;Zehr, 2002).…”
Section: Restorative and Conventional Justicementioning
confidence: 99%