Exploring consumer‐brand relationship quality and identification

Abstract

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to examine alternative constructs that are used in parallel to describe the strength of consumer-brand relationships. First, the two main conceptualisations of relationship quality (RQ), as developed by relationship marketing and branding literature, are analysed to highlight their common elements. Then, the recently applied in branding context concept of consumer-brand identification (CBI) is analysed, and issues regarding its nature and link to RQ are raised. Design/methodology/approach -The paper draws upon existing literature on the streams of branding and relationship marketing, to propose a conceptualisation of consumer-brand RQ and examine the link of CBI to RQ. To investigate the research questions, an exploratory qualitative paper is undertaken involving four focus groups with consumers who have developed relationships with cosmetic brands. Findings -Responses provide evidence for the concepts of satisfaction, trust, commitment, intimacy and love in describing consumer-brand RQ. CBI emerges as a distinct construct of cognitive nature. Furthermore, RQ appears to be differentiated according to consumer age. Research limitations/implications -This research enables commencement of empirical examination of the link between RQ and CBI and the relative role of age into building strong relationships with brands. Originality/value -The paper bridges two different research streams, relationship marketing and branding, into conceptualising consumer-brand RQ. Furthermore, the paper is a first attempt to explore the role of CBI in relation to the construct of RQ, thus fulfilling an identified gap in the literature regarding the link of those constructs.

Brand equity in the Pakistani hotel industry

“…Consumers' experience of service consumption is developed overwhelming determinant for the post-evaluation of brand loyalty and image, which subsequently leads to brand loyalty (Papista & Dimitriadis, 2012;So & King, 2010). In the service sector, particularly the hotel industry, consumers are generally focused on employee service, physical environment, awareness and image in customers' mind, which are all key components of customer-based brand equity (Ryu & Han, 2010).…”

Consumer-brand identification: A social identity based review and research directions

“…Although this stream of research, which is based on SIT (Tajfel & Turner, 1979), is attracting increasing attention in the marketing literature (Ahearne et al, 2005), it has been recognised that much of the empirical research has focused on examining the antecedents and consequences of consumer identification rather than carefully defining the nature of CBI itself. The confusion is due to the lack of clarity as to whether CBI includes cognitive and/or affective components (Lam, Ahearne, Hu, & Schillewaert, 2010;Papista & Dimitriadis, 2012). This reveals a gap in the literature: the lack of clear understanding of the nature of CBI.…”

Positive Word of Mouth Marketing: Explaining the Roles of Value Congruity and Brand Love

“…The reliability of questionnaire determined by Cronbach`s Alpha method and using the software SPSS; during performing the test, reliability omitted from brand commitment and customers` satisfaction Tab. 3 -Questionnaire, Source: (Kropp et al, 2003), (Aaker, 1996), (Villarejo, 2002), (Albert et al, 2008), (Shirkhodaie & Nabizade, 2011), (Tuskej et al, 2013), (Papista & Dimitriadis, 2012), (Zhou et al, 2013), (Kunzel & Halliday, 2008), (Sichtmann, 2007) Source Index Aspect Varibles Kropp et al, 2003 I feel a sense of belonging by using this brand. Using this brand makes me feel respected.…”