2021
DOI: 10.1177/19322968211045656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Decentralized Glucose and Behaviometric Monitoring of Persons with Type 2 Diabetes in the Setting of a Clinical Trial

Abstract: Background: Clinical trials often suffer from recruitment barriers and poor adherence, which increases costs and affects trial outcomes. Objective: To investigate the feasibility of Decentralized Clinical Trial (DCT) design elements to recruit, enroll, and engage patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: Patients with T2DM were recruited through a pharmacy and online recruitment using advert on Facebook, to 3 weeks monitoring of glucose and behaviometric parameters. Subjects recruited online coul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The considerations comprehensively support the DCT design, as it enables study monitoring with little cost and can reflect real‐world clinical practices. In the same vein, DCT approaches have been observed in trials for atrial fibrillation, 12 Parkinson's disease, 29 and type 2 diabetes, 30 all of which satisfy the aforementioned features. The efficacy results in our study were comparable to those in the traditional clinical trial, suggesting the feasibility of a DCT design in functional constipation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The considerations comprehensively support the DCT design, as it enables study monitoring with little cost and can reflect real‐world clinical practices. In the same vein, DCT approaches have been observed in trials for atrial fibrillation, 12 Parkinson's disease, 29 and type 2 diabetes, 30 all of which satisfy the aforementioned features. The efficacy results in our study were comparable to those in the traditional clinical trial, suggesting the feasibility of a DCT design in functional constipation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Participant recruitment is one of the largest barriers to successful clinical trials, and the included articles demonstrate that investigators are willing to implement decentralized methods to access potential participants through nontraditional means [1]. The studies identified in this review reported faster recruitment rates and higher amounts of enrolled participants through conducting the enrollment process virtually or by using social media advertisements [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. The strongest evidence comes from the trials that have conducted recruitment through virtual and traditional methods, comparing the outcomes between the two [18][19][20][21]23,24,28,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The studies identified in this review reported faster recruitment rates and higher amounts of enrolled participants through conducting the enrollment process virtually or by using social media advertisements [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. The strongest evidence comes from the trials that have conducted recruitment through virtual and traditional methods, comparing the outcomes between the two [18][19][20][21]23,24,28,29]. In addition, presenting patients with the opportunity to enroll in clinical trials implementing decentralized methods has also been shown to increase self-reported likelihood to enroll [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The Michigan Predictive Activity & Clinical Trajectories in Health (MIPACT) study is a good example of how data collected from wearable devices can inform clinical trial design, interpretation in clinical practice, and health-care interventions [ 72 ]. Wearable devices represent an important element that offers new opportunities for conducting decentralized clinical trials [ 73 ], which have been shown to be effective and feasible regarding recruitment, data collection from various electronic devices, and participant engagement to monitor physiological and behaviometric (physical activity and sleep patterns) parameters [ 74 ]. For practical purposes, Table 2 summarizes some characteristics of commercially available accelerometer-based wearable devices, many of which are used in research for physical activity quantification.…”
Section: Technological Monitoring Of Non-exercise Physical Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%