2013
DOI: 10.1007/jhep04(2013)152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Drell-Yan signals from the 4D Composite Higgs Model at the LHC

Abstract: We study the phenomenology of Drell-Yan processes at the Large Hadron Collider for the case of both the neutral and charged current channels within a recently proposed 4-Dimensional formulation of the Minimal Composite Higgs Model. We estimate the integrated and differential event rates at the CERN machine, assuming 14 TeV and data samples of ${\cal O}(100 {\rm{fb}}^{-1})$, as at lower energy and/or luminosity event rates are prohibitively small. We pay particular attention to the presence of multiple resonanc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neglecting the SO(4) explicit breaking, the masses of the SO(4) and SO(5)/SO(4) resonances are given 2 Actually, in order to guarantee a correct hypercharge assignment to the SM fermions, an extra U(1)X group needs to be added, bringing to 5 the number of neutral resonances. Under the assumption of equal couplings for the SO(5) and U(1)X groups (adopted in [35] as a specific parameter choice of the model described in [34]), two of the mass eigenstates can be redefined to be the ones aligned with the hypercharge direction, T Y = T 3R + T X , and the orthogonal combination respectively. Under this assumption, the latter will not couple to the constituents of the proton and we will therefore neglect it throughout our analysis (this happens in the minimal realisation where just the third generation of fermions mixes with the extended sector).…”
Section: Jhep07(2016)068mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Neglecting the SO(4) explicit breaking, the masses of the SO(4) and SO(5)/SO(4) resonances are given 2 Actually, in order to guarantee a correct hypercharge assignment to the SM fermions, an extra U(1)X group needs to be added, bringing to 5 the number of neutral resonances. Under the assumption of equal couplings for the SO(5) and U(1)X groups (adopted in [35] as a specific parameter choice of the model described in [34]), two of the mass eigenstates can be redefined to be the ones aligned with the hypercharge direction, T Y = T 3R + T X , and the orthogonal combination respectively. Under this assumption, the latter will not couple to the constituents of the proton and we will therefore neglect it throughout our analysis (this happens in the minimal realisation where just the third generation of fermions mixes with the extended sector).…”
Section: Jhep07(2016)068mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These EWSB effects will be the only source of corrections to the mass of the coset resonances, which will retain therefore a mass of √ 2f g ρ , modulo corrections of order ξ. The squared masses of the interested gauge bosons at O(ξ) are given by [35]:…”
Section: Jhep07(2016)068mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, limits from such direct searches greatly weaken within a regime where ρ resonances decay channels into top partner pairs kinematically open up. This is a direct consequence of significantly suppressed ρ 0,± branching ratios (BRs) into SM states due to the strong intercomposite coupling constant g ρ g SM [18,19]. In this case the strongest bound on EW spin one states is currently set by indirect limits from the S parameter [19].…”
Section: Jhep02(2016)055mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is emphasized in ref. [16,17], that one of the important approaches to probe the signatures of heavy vector bosons is through the Drell-Yan and vector-boson-fusion (VBF) production processes. In our phenomenology model, assuming that all the fermions are completely fundamental, the di-bosons final state should be particularly explored other than the leptonic channel and the multi-jets channel as they dominate in the branching ratios of both the heavy neutral and charged vector bosons.…”
Section: Jhep04(2014)052mentioning
confidence: 99%