Exploring equity and inclusion in Malawi’s National Disability Mainstreaming Strategy and Implementation Plan

Abstract

Background Equity and inclusion are important principles in policy development and implementation. The aim of this study is to explore the extent to which equity and inclusion were considered in the development of Malawi’s National Disability Mainstreaming Strategy and Implementation Plan. Methods We applied an analytical methodology to review the Malawi’s National Disability Mainstreaming Strategy and Implementation Plan using the EquIPP (Equity and Inclusion in Policy Processes) tool. The EquIPP tool assesses 17 Key Actions to explore the extent of equity and inclusion. Results The development of the Malawi National Disability Mainstreaming Strategy and Implementation Plan was informed by a desire to promote the rights, opportunities and wellbeing of persons with disability in Malawi. The majority (58%) of the Key Actions received a rating of three, indicating evidence of clear, but incomplete or only partial engagement of persons with disabilities in the policy process. Three (18%) of the Key Actions received a rating of four indicating that all reasonable steps to engage in the policy development process were observed. Four (23%) of the Key Actions received a score five indicating a reference to Key Action in the core documents in the policy development process. Conclusions The development of disability policies and associated implementation strategies requires equitable and inclusive processes that consider input from all stakeholders especially those whose wellbeing depend on such policies. It is pivotal for government and organisations in the process of policy or strategy development and implementation, to involve stakeholders in a virtuous process of co-production – co-implementation – co-evaluation, which may strengthen both the sense of inclusion and the effectiveness of the policy life-cycle.

Leveraging Gis for Enhanced Community Engagement in Elections: A Review of Practices, Impact, and Civic Responsibility

“…Zuniga-Teran et al (2019) emphasize the need for community engagement to harness funding opportunities from diverse funders, aligning with the goal of prioritizing inclusivity and equity (Akwei, 2018). discusses the importance of political stakeholder engagement, which aligns with the targeted outreach efforts utilizing GIS-driven demographic profiling to tailor communication strategies and enhance engagement among historically disenfranchised groups (Ebuenyi et al, 2021). highlight the significance of exploring equity and inclusion in policy development, supporting the need for promoting data literacy and education to ensure citizens possess the skills to engage meaningfully in the electoral process.…”

Intersex equality, diversity and inclusion and social policy: Silences, absences, and erasures in Ireland and the UK

“…Other areas of EDI policy analysis also usually overlook intersex people, notably disability equalities (for example, Ebuenyi et al, 2021) and children's equalities, which are more broadly underdeveloped in the EDI literature (for example Bagilhole, 1997Bagilhole, , 2009. Thus, whilst key aspects of equality, diversity and inclusion policy work, such as social justice, tackling discrimination, and assembling legal and policy infrastructures to ensure that these are implemented are highly relevant to intersex people, they are not realised or even visible.…”

“…Whilst there are dangers associated with the managerialist approach to EDI, such as ‘box-ticking’ and institutional resistance (Ahmed, 2012), the techniques and governance mechanisms associated with EDI could be very useful for intersex EDI. Some standard EDI tools such as consultation frameworks to include service users (Ebuenyi et al, 2021) are especially important for intersex people who have historically been shut out of service planning and delivery, but they need to be properly resourced. Intersex organisations are already leading work in some ways, and they should be supported, and capacity built as key stakeholders (Monro et al, 2017).…”

“This Is the Story of Community Leadership with Political Backing. (PM1)” Critical Junctures in Paralympic Legacy: Framing the London 2012 Disability Inclusion Model for New Global Challenges

“…Although the authors highlight the good intentions of policy makers, there was little evidence or clarity provided of the involvement of people with disabilities in its development. The paper concludes with the need to involve and engage with people with disabilities in the development of policy to ensure effective implementation [38].…”