While the number
of women in undergraduate and graduate chemistry
programs has increased in recent years, women remain under-represented
and excluded in the ranks of faculty in chemistry higher education.
This marginalization results from not only fewer women being offered
faculty positions but also fewer women applying for these positions.
To investigate the reasons why faculty positions are causing so many
women to turn elsewhere for employment, a survey was designed based
on the literature themes surrounding women’s career choices,
interviews with the current graduate student women in chemistry programs,
and our previous work. The survey was grounded in social cognitive
career theory (SCCT), and data were analyzed through a QuantCrit lens.
Despite the existing literature focusing on the impact of having children
on women’s career decisions, the desire to have children did
not appear among either the top priorities or the most important factors
in predicting whether any of the 130 survey respondents were interested
in a faculty career. Instead, faculty career interest was related
to themes of overwork, high expectations from departments, and expected
department emphasis on research despite an individual’s interest
in teaching and mentoring. Furthermore, women expressed a strong interest
in maintaining work–life balance but low expectations for their
ability to obtain a position that would allow it. They also reported
a desire to work for a department that values mental health and diversity
and supports its community members but similarly low expectations
for their ability to find a department that shares these values. These
themes suggest that chemistry departments must make fundamental changes
regarding what is tangibly valued and rewarded within their systems
if they wish to reduce the exclusion of women in faculty positions.