2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring flow in the mobile interface context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few studies have examined the negative outcomes of flow on consumers including consumer addiction (Barnes & Pressey, 2014; Chen et al., 2017; Stavropoulos et al., 2018), pathological and compulsive use (Bridges & Florsheim, 2008; Chen et al., 2017; Johnson et al., 2019; Mazzoni et al., 2017). In the literature, the term pathological or unhealthy use of CMEs describes a set of symptoms including obsessive thoughts about using CMEs, inability to cease using CMEs and overuse of CMEs, which result in mental health problems such as distress, mood‐altering and technostress (Davis, 2001; Johnson et al., 2019). Compulsive CMEs use refers to an uncontrollable drive or desire to use CMEs that leads an individual to repetitively engage in using CMEs that will ultimately hurt them (Davis, 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A few studies have examined the negative outcomes of flow on consumers including consumer addiction (Barnes & Pressey, 2014; Chen et al., 2017; Stavropoulos et al., 2018), pathological and compulsive use (Bridges & Florsheim, 2008; Chen et al., 2017; Johnson et al., 2019; Mazzoni et al., 2017). In the literature, the term pathological or unhealthy use of CMEs describes a set of symptoms including obsessive thoughts about using CMEs, inability to cease using CMEs and overuse of CMEs, which result in mental health problems such as distress, mood‐altering and technostress (Davis, 2001; Johnson et al., 2019). Compulsive CMEs use refers to an uncontrollable drive or desire to use CMEs that leads an individual to repetitively engage in using CMEs that will ultimately hurt them (Davis, 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive consumer‐focused outcomes of flow identified in previous studies include consumer entertainment, enjoyment of doing tasks in CMEs and subjective well‐being (e.g., Kim & Hall, 2019; Richard & Habibi, 2016; Wakefield & Whitten, 2006). A few studies have examined the negative outcomes of flow on consumers including consumer addiction (Barnes & Pressey, 2014; Chen et al., 2017; Stavropoulos et al., 2018), pathological and compulsive use (Bridges & Florsheim, 2008; Chen et al., 2017; Johnson et al., 2019; Mazzoni et al., 2017). In the literature, the term pathological or unhealthy use of CMEs describes a set of symptoms including obsessive thoughts about using CMEs, inability to cease using CMEs and overuse of CMEs, which result in mental health problems such as distress, mood‐altering and technostress (Davis, 2001; Johnson et al., 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies explore the positive relationship between location-dependent service and users' experience [34]. Some scholars document that visual localization directly results in hedonic perceptions, which including individual experience of agreeable, delightful, enjoyment, and pleasure [34]. The individuals might emerge virtual experience when the localization service is properly following with them.…”
Section: Mobile Technology Environment As Stimulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite all the advantages of this method, there is still a lack of systematic review that provides an overview of existing flow studies and addresses gaps in current knowledge in IS literature. While numerous SLR studies have been performed to investigate the other dominant theoretical paradigms in understanding user responses to IT (e.g., Al‐Emran et al, 2018; Hossain & Quaddus, 2012; Turner et al, 2010; Williams et al, 2015), to date, only a few researchers have briefly summarized previous studies on the flow theory in various IS topics (e.g., Finneran & Zhang, 2003; Guo & Poole, 2009; Hoffman & Novak, 2009; Johnson et al, 2020; Ozkara et al, 2017). However, all these studies are limited to sub‐topics, or limited in scope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%