1996
DOI: 10.5558/tfc72623-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring forest and recreation management preferences of forest recreationists in Alberta

Abstract: Understanding social values of stakeholder groups is an essenLa comprehension des valem sociales des groupes d'intervenants tial part of ecosystem management. Values of one stakeholder group, constitue un element essentiel de l'amenagement de I'ecosysteme. campers at managed sites in the Rocky-Clearwater Forest of Les valeurs d'un groupe d'intervenants, les campeurs des sites ameAlberta, were examined using campground management preference nages de la for6t Rocky Cleanvater en Alberta, ont ete etudiees and for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, consideration was given to conducting a statelevel analysis on the expectation of underlying differences between the Regional and state samples (Bengston 1994;Johnson et al 2004;McFarlane and Boxall 1996). However, as can be seen in Table 3, mean values for all three dimensions of Public Land Values for the two main state samples, Arizona and New Mexico, are not statistically different from the Regional sample.…”
Section: Exploratory Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Initially, consideration was given to conducting a statelevel analysis on the expectation of underlying differences between the Regional and state samples (Bengston 1994;Johnson et al 2004;McFarlane and Boxall 1996). However, as can be seen in Table 3, mean values for all three dimensions of Public Land Values for the two main state samples, Arizona and New Mexico, are not statistically different from the Regional sample.…”
Section: Exploratory Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such values are influenced by the social context in which they are formed and can differ across different population groups (Clement and Cheng 2011;Fischer 2010), but once formed are considered stable over time (Manning et al 1999;Stern et al 1995). In the context of resource planning, (forest) values are assumed to influence environmental attitudes (Dietz et al 2005;McFarlane and Boxall 1996) and help predict public reaction to changes in forest policy (Bengston 1994;Tarrant et al 2003). Therefore, to be useful to policymakers, the analysis must be connected to the set of demographic characteristics that influence the level of agreement for each dimension in held values (Bengston 1994;Stern 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%