2018
DOI: 10.1521/aeap.2018.30.5.382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Gender Differences in PrEP Interest Among Individuals Testing HIV Negative in an Urban Emergency Department

Abstract: PrEP is greater than 90% effective at preventing HIV infection, but many people who are vulnerable to HIV choose not to take PrEP. Among women, men who have sex with women (MSW) and men who have sex with men (MSM) who tested HIV negative in our emergency department, we assessed behavioral risk factors, self-perception of HIV risk, and interest in PrEP linkage. Women had lower odds of perceiving any HIV risk versus no risk compared to MSM (uOR=0.39, 95% CI 0.18–0.87), while Whites had greater odds of perceiving… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with prior research [ 41 43 ], low perceived HIV risk was an overarching theme in our findings. Women did not perceive themselves to be at risk of contracting HIV and reported low PrEP interest and motivation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Consistent with prior research [ 41 43 ], low perceived HIV risk was an overarching theme in our findings. Women did not perceive themselves to be at risk of contracting HIV and reported low PrEP interest and motivation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Consistent with prior research (42,43), low perceived HIV risk was an overarching theme in our ndings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In accord with similar studies of PrEP attitudes in women and Black African/Black Caribbean heterosexual populations, respondents were enthusiastic about the idea of PrEP but struggled to see how they would incorporate it within their own safer sex routines. This was because they did not see themselves as at risk of HIV and did not understand how PrEP could address their specific safer sex needs 16–18. As in previous studies, a lack of patient/community knowledge about PrEP hindered uptake 19.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%