2016
DOI: 10.3390/separations3020012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Gradients in Electrophoretic Separation and Preconcentration on Miniaturized Devices

Abstract: Over the last two decades, miniaturization, integration, and automation have made microfluidic systems popular. Core to advances in microfluidics are numerous electrophoretic separation and preconcentration strategies, some finding their origins on bench-top systems. Among them, gradient-based strategies are especially effective in addressing sensitivity challenges. This review introduces several gradient-based techniques according to a broad definition, including conductivity, field, and concentration, organi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
(159 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. Special reviews and papers deal with the particular sample clean‐up techniques, such as SPE , solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) , electromembrane extraction , selective electromembrane extraction based on isoelectric point , magneto‐immuno capture , and on‐line electrodriven sample‐stacking techniques . The latter electrodriven procedures include field amplified sample stacking , field enhanced or field‐amplified sample injection (FESI or FASI) ; large volume sample stacking (LVSS) , transient‐ITP (t‐ITP) , multiple capillary ITP (CITP) with repetitive hydrodynamic injection , dynamic pH junction , electrokinetic supercharging , and sweeping .…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. Special reviews and papers deal with the particular sample clean‐up techniques, such as SPE , solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) , electromembrane extraction , selective electromembrane extraction based on isoelectric point , magneto‐immuno capture , and on‐line electrodriven sample‐stacking techniques . The latter electrodriven procedures include field amplified sample stacking , field enhanced or field‐amplified sample injection (FESI or FASI) ; large volume sample stacking (LVSS) , transient‐ITP (t‐ITP) , multiple capillary ITP (CITP) with repetitive hydrodynamic injection , dynamic pH junction , electrokinetic supercharging , and sweeping .…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the reviewed period, no other methodological review on electrophoretic sample stacking appeared; the below mentioned reviews have broader or narrower scopes, or are focused on specific aspects. General reviews were aimed at enrichment techniques and enhancement of sensitivity in CE , their application in chiral CE , in CE‐MS and in the analysis of alkaloids . Electrophoretic stacking was also included in specialized reviews on CE analyses of peptides and proteins , pharmaceuticals , pesticides , antibiotics , food , and biologically important thiols .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Many methods of processing DNA on microfluidic platforms have utilized immobilization or capture. [8][9][10] General methods for concentrating analytes that utilize gradients in the buffers or fields 11,12 have been used to preconcentrate DNA, including temperature gradient focusing, 13 rheotaxis, 14 and isotachophoresis. 15 Electrokinetic trapping of DNA using membranes [16][17][18][19] and dielectrophoretic trapping of DNA in a microfluidic channel equipped with an array of electrodes have also been demonstrated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%