2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring how climate change subjective attribution, personal experience with extremes, concern, and subjective knowledge relate to pro-environmental attitudes and behavioral intentions in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important fact that must be taken into account is that Study 1 data were collected before the COVID-19 pandemic started. Personal experience with COVID-19 appears to be related to a stronger motivation to support environmental policies and taxes in the US [60]; climate perceptions and anti-COVID-19 behaviours were also found to be linked [61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Another important fact that must be taken into account is that Study 1 data were collected before the COVID-19 pandemic started. Personal experience with COVID-19 appears to be related to a stronger motivation to support environmental policies and taxes in the US [60]; climate perceptions and anti-COVID-19 behaviours were also found to be linked [61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…First, although knowingness and attitude items measure different psychological traits, responses to the items may be similar. In fact, previous research on proenvironmental behavior and climate change has found a clear causal relationship between knowledge and attitudes, whereby knowledge shapes attitudes (Shi et al, 2016;Geiger et al, 2018;Liu et al, 2020;Azizah, 2022;Wong-Parodi and Berlin Rubin, 2022). It is also conceivable that these two characteristics have much in common.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affect, knowledge, and experience also play central roles in appraising risk events. Our findings show how physical cues (e.g., damage or destruction of homes, businesses, and infrastructure) and psychological variables (e.g., stress, coping, and posttraumatic growth in response to the disaster) are associated with climate change risk perception [ 10 , 42 , 43 ]. The findings support research showing that affective responses may serve as a motivating factor such that people are more likely to take protective action to mitigate damage and threat exposure when they perceive a threat is likely and if mitigation efforts will be effective and practical [ 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%