2016
DOI: 10.1177/016146811611800804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring how Institutional Structures and Practices Influence English Learners’ Opportunity to Learn Social Studies

Abstract: Background/Context Current research addresses the marginalization of social studies and trends in teaching English learners (ELs) in monolingual schools; however, few studies have examined the way in which support services provided to ELs impact their exposure to social studies instruction. Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study Social studies is a difficult content area for ELs, as they grapple with culturally specific concepts in addition to language barriers. School structures and institutional … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Zoey, developing citizenships and promoting civic education in her classrooms aligned with dominant views of scholars, including an emphasis on rational thinking (Gert, 2007) and a desire for students to pursue active citizenship through service-learning opportunities (Flanagan & Gallay, 1995;Youniss & Yates, 1997). This belief in the power of social studies, as well as previous experiences with the subject's marginalization by the district and other teachers (Heafner & Plaisance, 2016;Heafner, 2017;Fitchett & Heafner, 2017), as a means toward the common good is what inspired her to prioritize social studies learning in her class and to take the social studies position in fifth grade. Viewing it as more than just "her subject," she explained her belief in social studies as a force for producing an important part of the citizenry and thinking skills of students in a way that data-driven focuses on math and literacy do not, particularly in regards to finding valid evidence, weighing and deliberating evidence, and coming to appropriate conclusions.…”
Section: Social Studies Marginalizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For Zoey, developing citizenships and promoting civic education in her classrooms aligned with dominant views of scholars, including an emphasis on rational thinking (Gert, 2007) and a desire for students to pursue active citizenship through service-learning opportunities (Flanagan & Gallay, 1995;Youniss & Yates, 1997). This belief in the power of social studies, as well as previous experiences with the subject's marginalization by the district and other teachers (Heafner & Plaisance, 2016;Heafner, 2017;Fitchett & Heafner, 2017), as a means toward the common good is what inspired her to prioritize social studies learning in her class and to take the social studies position in fifth grade. Viewing it as more than just "her subject," she explained her belief in social studies as a force for producing an important part of the citizenry and thinking skills of students in a way that data-driven focuses on math and literacy do not, particularly in regards to finding valid evidence, weighing and deliberating evidence, and coming to appropriate conclusions.…”
Section: Social Studies Marginalizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Despite the call for meaningful citizenship education, the marginalization of social studies has been documented for years, especially within schools that do not test the subject (Heafner et al, 2006, Fitchett & Heafner, 2010, Heafner & Plaisance, 2016. Limited exposure to civic education and service learning, particularly in the elementary grades, creates a socio-cultural civic engagement gap (Barton & Levstik, 2004;Castro & Knowles, 2017;NCSS, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…OTL can also account for differences in outcomes related to gender and mathematics (Albano & Rodriguez, 2013). English language learners may also be particularly susceptible to differences in OTL (Heafner & Plaisance, 2016).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%