2017
DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2017.1328157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring how the social model of disability can be re-invigorated for autism: in response to Jonathan Levitt

Abstract: Levitt argues that the social model of disability needs to be re-invigorated, potentially by adapting the tool for separate countries. The social model has been successfully applied for some disabled groups in the United Kingdom. However, the social model is not implemented for neurodivergent labels such as autism, through the negative language of autism, causing severe problems for autistic individuals' daily lives. The social model can be re-invigorated for autism, removing social barriers by changing non-au… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the fundamental assumption of that model is that, 'disability', as constructed by this model is a consequence of social and multiple other societal barriers. The social model of disability has been used to study the daily lives of persons with disabilities across the globe [39][40][41][42][43]. The model can be related to the way a society upholds the rights of persons with disabilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the fundamental assumption of that model is that, 'disability', as constructed by this model is a consequence of social and multiple other societal barriers. The social model of disability has been used to study the daily lives of persons with disabilities across the globe [39][40][41][42][43]. The model can be related to the way a society upholds the rights of persons with disabilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the Research Domain Criteria framework (RDoC; National Institute of Mental Health, 2017) to organise our review of the range of characteristics that might affect autistic pupils' experiences. Adopting the RDoC framework is more consistent with inclusive educational practices that employ a social model (Woods, 2017) or neurodiversity framework (Baron‐Cohen, 2017), compared to diagnostic criteria for autism used in clinical settings (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Whereas the former is framed in terms of differences within the range of human variation, the latter emphasises deficits and ‘disorder’.…”
Section: Rdoc Domains (Dsm‐5) Criteria For Autism Spectrum Disorder Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"I wanted to do it on my own, to prove to myself that I can get up and go as it were, so I didn't tell her and she didn't find out until, well, after [I] had stopped being homeless." Max Conclusion Woods (2017) argues that despite the United Kingdom's wide adoption of the social model of disability, it has not permeated the autism field. He describes a systematic oppression of autistic individuals which is reflected in the social and economic disadvantages experienced by Max and Peter in many aspects of their lives.…”
Section: Pathways Out Of Homelessnessmentioning
confidence: 99%