Exploring individual and work organizational peculiarities of working in emergency medical communication centers in Norway- a qualitative study

Abstract

Background Emergency Medical call-takers working in Emergency Medical Communication Centers (EMCCs) are addressing complex and potentially life threatening problems. The call-takers have to make fast decisions, responding to problems described in phone calls. Recent studies focus mainly on individual aspects of call-takers’ work. The objectives of this study were to explore 1) What characterizes individual work performance of call takers in EMCCs? and 2) What characterizes work organizational factors call takers see as most relevant to the performance of their work? Methods The research is based upon in-depth interviews with call takers at three EMCCs in Norway ( n = 19). Interviews were performed during the period May 2013 to September 2014. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Two main themes that related to individual work performance and to work organizational factors in EMCCs were identified, namely: 1) “Core technologies” and 2) “Environmental issues” . The theme “Core technologies” included the subthemes a) multiple tasks, b) critical incidents, and c) unpredictability. The theme “Environmental issues” included the subthemes a) lack of support, b) lack of resources, c) exposure to complaints, and d) an invisible service. Conclusion At the individual level, multiple tasks, how to cope with critical incidents, and the unpredictability of daily work when calls are received, make the work of call takers both stressful and challenging. The individual call taker’s ability to interprete the situation by intuition and experience when calls are received, is the main factor behind the peculiarities working in the centers at the individual level. At the organizational level, the lack of resources and managerial support seems to provoke concerns about the quality of services rendered by the centers. These aspects should be taken into account in the managing of these services, making them a more integrated part of the health service system. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4370-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Registered nurses' understandings of emergency medical dispatch center work: A qualitative phenomenographic interview study

“…However, this evidence is not conclusive, given for instance the findings of Rawshani et al (2017) that dispatchers missed fewer acute coronary syndromes in emergency calls, as compared to RNs. EMDC work is considered by RNs to be both stimulating and difficult (Leonardsen et al, 2019). The reported challenges included making decisions, giving advice, and educating callers, for example teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), without visual cues.…”

“…EMDC work is considered by RNs to be both stimulating and difficult (Leonardsen et al, 2019). The reported challenges included making decisions, giving advice, and educating callers, for example teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), without visual cues.…”

Evaluating a training intervention for improving alignment between emergency medical telephone operators and callers: a pilot study of communication behaviours

“…Calls to medical emergency lines constitute an essential component in the chain of survival, yet they have been characterized as a ‘black box’ in research on prehospital care [ 3 ]. In these calls, operators rely on what they can elicit from callers to visualize the current and evolving situation [ 4 ], which they combine with professional guidelines and available resources to make critical decisions [ 5 ]. While operators achieve high levels of accuracy with the most urgent cases, their decision accuracy falters when the patient’s situation appears ambiguous or vague [ 5 , 6 ].…”

“…In these calls, operators rely on what they can elicit from callers to visualize the current and evolving situation [ 4 ], which they combine with professional guidelines and available resources to make critical decisions [ 5 ]. While operators achieve high levels of accuracy with the most urgent cases, their decision accuracy falters when the patient’s situation appears ambiguous or vague [ 5 , 6 ]. In this dynamic, interactional arena, operators acknowledge the essential role of smooth cooperation with the caller [ 7 ].…”

“…In contrast, not aligning with a caller’s emotional state can generate conflict that delays critical care [ 13 ]. Operators report finding callers’ levels of distress a particular obstacle for their efforts to triage [ 5 ]; indeed, callers with high levels of emotional distress obstruct recognition of cardiac arrest [ 7 ].…”