Exploring Individual Differences in Recognizing Idiomatic Expressions in Context

Abstract

Written language comprehension requires readers to integrate incoming information with stored mental knowledge to construct meaning. Literally plausible idiomatic expressions can activate both figurative and literal interpretations, which convey different meanings. Previous research has shown that contexts biasing the figurative or literal interpretation of an idiom can facilitate its processing. Moreover, there is evidence that processing of idiomatic expressions is subject to individual differences in linguistic knowledge and cognitive-linguistic skills. It is therefore conceivable that individuals vary in the extent to which they experience context-induced facilitation in processing idiomatic expressions. To explore the interplay between reader-related variables and contextual facilitation, we conducted a self-paced reading experiment. We recruited participants who had recently completed a battery of 33 behavioural tests measuring individual differences in linguistic knowledge, general cognitive skills and linguistic processing skills. In the present experiment, a subset of these participants read idiomatic expressions that were either presented in isolation or preceded by a figuratively or literally biasing context. We conducted analyses on the reading times of idiom-final nouns and the word thereafter (spill-over region) across the three conditions, including participants' scores from the individual differences battery. Our results showed no main effect of the preceding context, but substantial variation between readers and variation in contextual facilitation. We encourage interested researchers to exploit the present dataset for follow-up studies on individual differences in idiom processing.

Assessing the Capability of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing in Solving Radiology Case Vignettes

“…Language and linguistic challenges, such as idiomatic expressions or cultural references, could pose difficulties for the AI models in accurately comprehending and responding to the questions, whereas the residents' human intuition and linguistic skills give them an advantage. 14 We found the explanation of the AI in supporting the answers was accurate in less than 50% of the cases. The AI models may have inherent limitations in understanding the specific nuances, details, or contextual elements of the topics being evaluated.…”

“…Language and linguistic challenges, such as idiomatic expressions or cultural references, could pose difficulties for the AI models in accurately comprehending and responding to the questions, whereas the residents' human intuition and linguistic skills give them an advantage. 14 …”

Individual Differences in Holistic and Compositional Language Processing

“…Discussions of processing speed in linguistic research are found primarily in studies of aging and language, given that a slowing in processing speed is a well-established component of cognitive aging (Eckert, 2010;Rogalski et al, 2011;Salthouse, 1996;Soble et al, 2016). However, processing speed correlates with picture naming, auditory lexical decision, and idiom processing in young adults as well (Hintz et al, 2020;Tilmatine et al, 2021). It has been proposed to index the ease/speed with which incoming input can be integrated into unfolding representations (Huettig & Janse, 2016).…”