2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2018.03.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring influence maximization in online and offline double-layer propagation scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [98], if the euclidean distance between two users in time t is less than a defined threshold, these users are considered as neighbors in the offline layer; this implies that edges in that layer are dynamic and change over the time. To select a seed set, the network is then compressed into a single layer and the problem is solved using a simulation-based strategy.…”
Section: Physical Relationship-aware Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [98], if the euclidean distance between two users in time t is less than a defined threshold, these users are considered as neighbors in the offline layer; this implies that edges in that layer are dynamic and change over the time. To select a seed set, the network is then compressed into a single layer and the problem is solved using a simulation-based strategy.…”
Section: Physical Relationship-aware Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To select a seed set, the network is then compressed into a single layer and the problem is solved using a simulation-based strategy. In addition, a centralitybased method is proposed in [98] to identify a set of influential seeds with lower overlap. In [54], according to the ratio of attendance of two users in a common place over a time period, a weight is assigned to each offline edge.…”
Section: Physical Relationship-aware Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this work, improved greedy algorithms [8,9,13,24], community based approaches [7,23,36], new centrality measures [35,37] and efficient heuristics [15,25,31,45] have been proposed to solve the problem aiming to balance the time complexity of algorithms and the influence propagation and trying to make them scalable to large datasets. In recent years, researchers have studied the influence maximization problem in more complex networks by taking the heterogeneity of individual relationships [18] or multiplexity [42] into consideration.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the analysis above, we can extend the native greedy selection algorithm to solve the SATA problem, which can return at least ð1 − 1/eÞapproximation ratio of the optimal result and is widely used to solve the influence maximization problem [29]. Algorithm 1 shows the details of the native greedy selection algorithm.…”
Section: Algorithm Designmentioning
confidence: 99%