2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring informal mathematical products of low achievers at the secondary school level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We aimed to make the Mathematics Week a combination of learning and gaming. Moreover, Karsenty et al (2007) has suggested that interesting task and informal approach can effectively increase the learning intention in Mathematics of the relatively low-achieving students. This can avoid their resistance on learning at the aspect with no confidence while the conventional learning ways cannot resolve.…”
Section: Qualitative Evaluation Of Reflective Journalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We aimed to make the Mathematics Week a combination of learning and gaming. Moreover, Karsenty et al (2007) has suggested that interesting task and informal approach can effectively increase the learning intention in Mathematics of the relatively low-achieving students. This can avoid their resistance on learning at the aspect with no confidence while the conventional learning ways cannot resolve.…”
Section: Qualitative Evaluation Of Reflective Journalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was also evidence supporting Hughes' (1991) finding (with younger children), that learners may be comfortable using symbols representing quantities before symbols representing operations. Consider Figure 10, where a thirteen-year-old student independently introduced an addition sign to a containers-based representation (his preferred form), indicating understanding that his strategy for the division task set (100 people in 25-seater buses) was equivalent to repeated addition of 25 up to a total of 100.…”
Section: Figure 7: Factors Of 30mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…For example, observe the mixing of drawn organisational and decorative elements with number symbols, as seen in Figure 3 There are many theoretical, methodological and pedagogical issues relating to students' own representational strategies for arithmetical problem-solving. Karsenty et al (2007) argue that teachers' appreciation and legitimisation of students' informal mathematical products is crucial for the developing understanding of low-attaining students. This may happen in Early Years education; however, for secondary-aged students, they are much less likely to be expected, encouraged or appreciated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cognitive characteristics of underachieving math students include, but are not limited to, difficulties in remembering mathematical procedures (Karsenty et al, 2007), continual seeking of teacher's attention, difficulty in advancing by their own efforts (Brophy, 1996), inflexible use of previously accrued mathematical knowledge (Verscchaffel & De Corte, 1995), and difficulty in coping with the language of mathematics in both reading and writing (Karsenty et al, 2007). All these issues aside, these students have metacognitive difficulties, e.g., in using heuristic methods to solve problems (Keijzer & Terwel, 2004).…”
Section: Literature Review Underachieving Math Students: Who Are They and What Are Their Characteristics?mentioning
confidence: 99%