Exploring Innovation Ecosystem of Incumbents in the Face of Technological Discontinuities: Automobile Firms

Abstract

In recent years, the innovation ecosystem concept has received much attention in the strategy and innovation fields to address radical or discontinuous innovation. This study aims to explore the innovation ecosystem construct of incumbents in the face of technological discontinuities, focusing on the ecosystem actors (that is, incumbents, component providers, and complementors) and their activities for sustainable value creation. First, we conducted a literature review of 34 highly cited and relevant research documents discussing the innovation ecosystem concept to extract key phrases for the innovation ecosystem’s research framework. Then, through the lens of dynamic capabilities, the five core capabilities of incumbent focal firms—collaboration and networking, opportunity sensing, entrepreneurial orientation, knowledge management, and strategic flexibility—are derived as key elements of the research framework. In addition, the following case study conducted by the content analysis of two leading automobile incumbents, Volkswagen and Toyota, supports and concretizes the established research framework. We conclude that as the value chain in the industry is open to diverse emerging experts holding critical technologies in the era of discontinuous innovation, the ecosystem actors are extensively linked beyond existing industry boundaries. Next, incumbents’ proposed five core capabilities are essential for their successful navigation of the complex innovation ecosystem. Finally, the case study also indicates that the traditional automobile giants in the existing ecosystem are heading toward sustainable value creation via technology internalization and dominant platform building to transform themselves into leaders of a new innovation ecosystem in the era of Connected, Autonomous, Shared and Services, and Electric (C.A.S.E.) innovation in the automobile industry.

Dynamic Corporate Governance, Innovation, and Sustainability: Post-COVID Period

“…Numerous qualitative studies have recently been published in different areas of sustainability research (e.g., agriculture [84], corporate sustainability and reporting [85], and sustainability education [86]), and also on topics similar to this research (CSR and competitive advantage [87], COVID-19 challenges for companies [88], and ESG [89]). Regarding concrete methods in sustainability research, qualitative content analysis [90,91] and case studies at smaller [58] and larger companies [92] have also been published recently.…”

Building a Hierarchical Enablers Framework for Service Business Model Innovation for Sustainable Performance: Evidence from Ghana’s Electricity Sector

“…Knowledge-intensive services, including software development, management consulting, scientific and technical evaluation, business audit, marketing analysis and foresight, complex machinery repair, engineering, data storage and analysis, and telecommunication services predominantly exchanged in business-to-business transactions, play a critical role as connectors between service providers and clients in the power industry [43]. The ability to share insights, best practices, and market intelligence promotes collaborative learning and contributes to the co-creation of value by integrating diverse perspectives and expertise, as highlighted by [44] in their emphasis on cross-organizational collaboration for value co-creation and co-innovation for sustainable growth. Firms can leverage insights from key actors in their networks to further their innovation and sustainability agenda.…”

Digital Transformation and Business Process Innovation in Slovenian Automotive Industry: An in-Depth Qualitative Study

“…As firms along the value chain in automotive industry are very different, it is an interesting issue whether the technological advancements have similar effects on their business models. Incumbent automotive companies along the supply chain are forced to introduce new business models at higher pace to win a competitive battle with start-up business models in the mobility sector (Kim, Paek & Lee, 2022;Remane, Hanelt, Nickerson & Kolbe, 2016). In general, DT in an organization enables better customization and higher customer satisfaction with lower manufacturing costs.…”