Network Knowledge in International Business
DOI: 10.4337/9781781950623.00018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring inward-outward linkages in firms' internationalization: a knowledge and network perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research also acknowledges the importance of knowledge process, acquisition, and exploitation, which represent the absorptive capacity of the firm and detailed inter-firm knowledge sharing which is essential to enable firms in GVC are connecting to each other through learning processes. The absorptive capacity is projected as crucial for the dynamic capability of the firm in acquiring, assimilating, and exploiting knowledge flow that emerges from the inward and outward internationalisation of the firm (Zahra and George 2002); nevertheless, prior literature was only concerned with the intra-firm knowledge sharing in establishing inward-outward internationalisations (Karlsen et al, 2003;Welch et al, 2002;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research also acknowledges the importance of knowledge process, acquisition, and exploitation, which represent the absorptive capacity of the firm and detailed inter-firm knowledge sharing which is essential to enable firms in GVC are connecting to each other through learning processes. The absorptive capacity is projected as crucial for the dynamic capability of the firm in acquiring, assimilating, and exploiting knowledge flow that emerges from the inward and outward internationalisation of the firm (Zahra and George 2002); nevertheless, prior literature was only concerned with the intra-firm knowledge sharing in establishing inward-outward internationalisations (Karlsen et al, 2003;Welch et al, 2002;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%