Exploring lack of closure as a brand transgression

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to contribute to research into narrative brands by investigating if the lack of closure in the ambiguous season two’s ending of the Australian television series, Wanted, constituted a brand transgression. Design/methodology/approach Comments on posts about Wanted from social media accounts associated with the series were downloaded and analysed using thematic analysis informed by non-participatory netnography. Findings Audiences found the ambiguous ending of Wanted season two disappointing and it did not fulfil implied promises and their expectations, which fits the description of a brand transgression, and so they engaged in behaviours indicative of a brand transgression such as spreading negative word of mouth online. The ambiguous ending could have been a cliff-hanger to lead into a third season that was not guaranteed when the final episode aired, or the ending for the entire series. Although a third season was eventually made and positively received by audiences, viewer numbers declined by nearly a third, illustrating the importance of brand management for narrative brands. Practical implications This research has implications for the creators of television series, particularly if they do not know if it will be renewed. Not providing audiences with their expected closure can constitute a brand transgression and damage the narrative brand’s residual brand equity and potential earnings from streaming or a revival at a later date. Originality/value Prior research has focused on audiences’ responses to definitive endings, rather than ambiguous endings, which is the focus of this research. Furthermore, narrative brands are still an under-researched context.

I Didn’t Win! An Overlooked Downside of Crowdsourcing?

“…Applied to crowdsourcing, we hypothesize that participants who do not win a crowdsourcing contest will temporarily disengage from the sponsoring brand owing to negative affect associated with losing (i.e., losing a contest → negative emotional reaction toward sponsor → temporary disengagement from sponsoring brand). This hypothesis is consistent with evidence that consumers disengage from a brand when the brand violates relationship norms (Aaker, Fournier, and Brasil 2004), fails to reciprocate (Palmer and Bejou 1994), or engages in disappointing behavior (Burgess and Jones 2021). Note that our theory centers on customers' immediate (vs. long-term) response, given that the effect's underlying mechanism is emotional.…”

Social media discussion forums, home country and immigrant consumer acculturation: the case of Iranian immigrants in Australia

“…By observing participants’ online interactions, netnography provides researchers with a robust tool to study social phenomena in the online realm (Kozinets, 2019). Netnography has been extensively applied by social researchers in recent years to study consumers’ online interactions and experiences (Burgess and Jones, 2021; Colliander and Hauge Wien, 2013; Guèvremont, 2019; Kjeldgaard and Bode, 2017). Following Kozinets (2002, 2019) guidelines, we adopted an observational approach, which allowed us to investigate participants’ acculturation processes and identity projects in an uninhibited way.…”

Salesperson attributes that influence consumer perceptions of sales interactions

“…The researchers then created a conceptual map of the review text based on a deep learning procedure that extracts a three-level network model of meaning from the data to discover critical themes and their relationships (Krishen et al, 2014(Krishen et al, , 2019Petrescu et al, 2019). Previous consumer research studies have used Leximancer in different circumstances, including to analyze social media content (Krishen et al, 2019), viral social media consumer communication (Petrescu et al, 2019), consumer comments (Burgess and Jones, 2021) and consumer interviews (Chikweche and Fletcher, 2014).…”