2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-018-4888-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring landslide erosion volume–area scaling relationships by slip depth using changes in DTMs for basin sediment volume estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar approach was used to estimate landslide volumes in Taiwan (S.‐C. Chen et al., 2019; Tseng et al., 2013). Many polygon boundaries mapped from aerial image interpretation were subsequently edited to improve their fit in relation to the difference raster and this involved both enlarging and shrinking the size of scar polygons.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar approach was used to estimate landslide volumes in Taiwan (S.‐C. Chen et al., 2019; Tseng et al., 2013). Many polygon boundaries mapped from aerial image interpretation were subsequently edited to improve their fit in relation to the difference raster and this involved both enlarging and shrinking the size of scar polygons.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two DEMs were used to calculate a 1-m resolution elevation difference raster calculated between the 2018 and 2016-2017 DEMs (i.e., 2018 minus 2016-2017) Therefore, elevation losses resulting from landsliding show as negative values in the resulting raster. A similar approach was used to estimate landslide volumes in Taiwan (S.-C. Chen et al, 2019;Tseng et al, 2013). Many polygon boundaries mapped from aerial image interpretation were subsequently edited to improve their fit in relation to the difference raster and this involved both enlarging and shrinking the size of scar polygons.…”
Section: Landslide Database Generation and Lidar-based Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fragment size distributions of a rockfall can be expressed in terms of cumulative relative frequency, and tted by a power-law equation characterized by two parameters (i.e., ) in Eq. (7). is a constant associated with the minimum signi cant block size ( ), and is an exponent which is the slope of the distribution in a log-log representation.…”
Section: Rockfall Volume Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist several practical examples of estimating landslide volumes that rely on empirical power-law relationships between the area of a landslide and its volume 2 , 15 , 16 Although area (A) can be easily obtained from a landslide inventory map, volume (V) typically requires a small amount of field component or accurate pre- and post-event topographic data to finally compute the scaling exponent γ and intercept α in the equation V = α.A γ 17 . Literature suggests that the major source of uncertainty in the volume estimation comes from the uncertainty in the parameter γ 2 , 18 . The value of γ is reported to be in the range of 1.0 ≤ γ ≤ 1.9 for a volume sizes of 10 2 m 3 to 10 3 m 3 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%