Exploring mindset’s applicability to students’ experiences with challenge in transformed college physics courses

Abstract

The mindset literature is a longstanding area of psychological research focused on beliefs about intelligence, response to challenge, and goals for learning (Dweck, 2000). However, the mindset literature's applicability to the context of college physics has not been widely studied. In this paper we narrow our focus toward students' descriptions of their responses to challenge in college physics. We ask the research questions, "can we see responses to challenge in college physics that resemble that of the mindset literature?" and "how do students express evidence of challenge and to what extent is such evidence reflective of challenges found in the mindset literature?" To answer these questions, we developed a novel coding scheme for interview dialogue around college physics challenge and students' responses to it. In this paper we present the development process of our coding scheme. We find that it is possible to see student descriptions of challenge that resemble the mindset literature's characterizations. However, college physics challenges are frequently different than those studied in the mindset literature. We show that, in the landscape of college physics challenges, mindset beliefs cannot always be considered to be the dominant factor in how students respond to challenge. Broadly, our coding scheme helps the field move beyond broad Likert-scale survey measures of students' mindset beliefs.

Improving STEM self-efficacy with a scalable classroom intervention targeting growth mindset and success attribution

“…One possible explanation is that our instrumentation was inadequate to detect self-efficacy changes. Measuring selfefficacy via self-reporting by adults-individuals sophisticated enough to care about face, to maintain bravado, and to detect what authority figures and tests are looking foris notoriously difficult [59]. Systematic biases are one concern.…”

“…Growth mindset has also been linked to other variables associated with strong performance [56,57], although perhaps only for academically at-risk students [58]. Its applicability to university-level physics has not been extensively studied [59].…”

Views from students and professors in a nonmajor introductory physics course: What is interdisciplinarity?

“…This work represents an initial phase of the "progressive refinement of hypotheses" process, wherein researchers collect relevant data around a general research question in order to inform more specific hypotheses to test and questions to answer. In conducting this preliminary analysis, we also draw on ideas from "constant comparison" methodologies, as described and employed by Little et al [24], to refine the concepts and relationships in our analysis. In this work, we focus on the analysis of an individual researcher, I. D., who had a close relationship with the data, as the first step of the methodology presented in Ref.…”

Perceived irrelevance and achievement goals: Two mindset variables within attitudinal experiences of life science majors in introductory physics

“…[14] Perceived relevance has been duly noted in terms of students' buy-in and self-perception, [15] and clearly identified as a potential issue when interpreting students' content gains. While many other factors of mindset are important to consider for introductory physics, [4] this paper will focus on the combined effect of mastery/performance achievement goals and perceived relevance of physics to one's life science major.…”

“…The notion of student mindset, [1][2] as recently applied to learning physics, [3][4] builds upon research upon students' epistemological views of learning, [5] particularly with regard to learning physics. [6] In particular, the notion of student mindset has been recognized as a potential factor for the success of physics majors, both throughout the undergraduate physics major curriculum [7] and extending into graduate school and even career paths for physical science majors.…”