2020
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring multidimensional operationalizations of precarious employment in Swedish register data – a typological approach and a summative score approach

Abstract: This paper presents items of precarious employment (PE) operationalised as a summative scale and an employment typology using register-based labour market data. Three PE types, as well as a wide range of summative scale scores indicating precariousness, were found. Sociodemographic characteristics often found overrepresented in PE were confirmed, and new perspectives on some of these are given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this process, for analytical feasibility, employment states were merged according to their perceived employment quality: (i) low (PER, SSE, UE), (ii) high (SER, SER/ HI, BO) and (iii) HMJH, which could not be determined to be either high or low quality in this study and hence kept separate. Similar interpretation of the quality of the employment types has been made in a previous study (16). Once the 21 trajectories were created, trajectories of low quality were identified as based on (i) the quality of employment states included in the trajectory, ie, the presence of low-quality employment states, and (ii) the pattern of the trajectory, ie, the direction could not entail an improvement in conditions across the trajectory (upwards mobility).…”
Section: Exposure Assessment: Employment Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this process, for analytical feasibility, employment states were merged according to their perceived employment quality: (i) low (PER, SSE, UE), (ii) high (SER, SER/ HI, BO) and (iii) HMJH, which could not be determined to be either high or low quality in this study and hence kept separate. Similar interpretation of the quality of the employment types has been made in a previous study (16). Once the 21 trajectories were created, trajectories of low quality were identified as based on (i) the quality of employment states included in the trajectory, ie, the presence of low-quality employment states, and (ii) the pattern of the trajectory, ie, the direction could not entail an improvement in conditions across the trajectory (upwards mobility).…”
Section: Exposure Assessment: Employment Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This is a longitudinal register-study based on the Swedish Work, Illness, and Labour-market Participation (SWIP) cohort ( 16 ). The SWIP cohort is the result of linkage of multiple registers and includes all registered individuals in Sweden, aged 16–65 years (approximately 5.4 million individuals), in 2005 and followed until 2017.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We adapted the Jonsson et al PE score that was based on a total of five items within three dimensions: employment insecurity, income inadequacy and lack of rights and protection. 26 For the purpose of this study, only employment insecurity and income inadequacy were included in the PE score. Lack of rights and protection could not be included directly given the unavailability of the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%