2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring neural network training strategies to determine phase transitions in frustrated magnetic models

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible next step is to investigate transfer learning for the models that are trained here. Indeed, the case investigated here is the J 1 = 1, J 2 = 0 special case of the J 1 -J 2 Ising model that has recently been investigated from the machinelearning perspective [17,18], and it would be interesting to see how our neural networks trained on the case J 2 /J 1 = 0 perform for other values of J 2 /J 1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One possible next step is to investigate transfer learning for the models that are trained here. Indeed, the case investigated here is the J 1 = 1, J 2 = 0 special case of the J 1 -J 2 Ising model that has recently been investigated from the machinelearning perspective [17,18], and it would be interesting to see how our neural networks trained on the case J 2 /J 1 = 0 perform for other values of J 2 /J 1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The square-lattice Ising model is an exactly solved model [12]. Notwithstanding its exact solution, it is commonly employed in the ML context [3][4][5][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Motivations for such ML studies of the Ising model in 2D include the readily available comparison to the exact solution and that training data can be easily generated using standard Monte-Carlo simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study we focus on the highly frustrated region of R < −1/4, for which both the EFT and CMF analytical approximations predicted no phase transition but the numerical approaches indicated some kind of phase transition to a highly degenerate low-temperature phase with no long-range ordering Corte et al 2021;Acevedo et al 2021). In our previous study, focused on the less frustrated case of −1/4 < R < 0, we demonstrated that with the increasing frustration (R → −1/4 and T → 0) the system tends to freeze in metastable domain states separated by large energy barriers with extremely sluggish dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This frustrated model is also interesting from the experimental point of view, since it can be applied to some real materials (Matsuda et al 2010;Tsirlin et al 2010). The ground state of the J 1 − J 2 Ising model was investigated in some earlier papers (Houtappel 1950;Kudō and Katsura 1976;Katsura et al 1986) but its critical behavior was studied only recently by the effective field theory (EFT) (Bobák et al 2016), the MC simulation ( Žukovič et al 2020; Žukovič 2021), cluster mean-field (CMF) (Schmidt and Godoy 2021) and machine learning (ML) (Corte et al 2021;Acevedo et al 2021) approaches. For smaller degree of frustration, namely within the interval −1/4 < R < 0, the critical behavior resembles that for the square lattice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 20 30 . In the field of nanomagnetism and micromagnetics, deep neural networks are used to extract microstructural features in magnetic thin film elements 31 34 , and to explore materials with ease 35 . Refrences 36 38 use a sophisticated combination of machine learning techniques to predict the magnetization dynamics of magnetic thin film elements over one nanosecond.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%