2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.124925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring node importance evolution of weighted complex networks in urban rail transit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e experimental results indicated that the comprehensive indicators outperformed the use of a single traditional evaluation indicator. In the research of Meng et al [39], TOPSIS together with coefficient of variation was applied for the identification of important nodes, where the best improvement was that different attributes of the nodes were weighted before aggregating. To reasonably weight the network nodes, Hu et al [40] developed a way of combining ISM with traditional NNI evaluation and validated the effectiveness of the combined method by the simulations on the Advance Research Project Agency (ARPA) network.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e experimental results indicated that the comprehensive indicators outperformed the use of a single traditional evaluation indicator. In the research of Meng et al [39], TOPSIS together with coefficient of variation was applied for the identification of important nodes, where the best improvement was that different attributes of the nodes were weighted before aggregating. To reasonably weight the network nodes, Hu et al [40] developed a way of combining ISM with traditional NNI evaluation and validated the effectiveness of the combined method by the simulations on the Advance Research Project Agency (ARPA) network.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Centrality indices provide a common and effective approach to analyze the spatial configurations of transport networks [42]. For a flow network, weighted complex indices have been developed and applied to public transport [43][44][45]. We select three critical indices in the MCA model to measure the characteristics of centrality: namely, weighted degree, weighted betweenness, and weighted closeness.…”
Section: Multiple Weighted Centrality Assessment Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies on this topic mainly focus on the following aspects: (1) the topological characteristics of the entire network [18], such as the small-world [19,20] and scale-free [21,22] effects, which are analyzed on the basis of the classical statistical indicators [23] of complex networks, such as the average shortest path length or diameter, network efficiency, density, assortativity [24,25], etc. ; (2) the topological features or node importance [26,27] of metro stations, which are evaluated on the basis of the centrality parameters of network nodes [17], such as the degree centrality (DC) [28], betweenness centrality (BC) [29], closeness centrality (CC) [29], eigenvector centrality (EC) [8,28] and PageRank (PR) [30]; (3) the vulnerability [31][32][33][34], robustness [35][36][37] and resilience [38][39][40][41] of the metro-complex network, which are evaluated on the basis of (1) and ( 2); (4) the dynamic evolution law of a network or node, which is studied, and the rationality of the network development, which is assessed [42][43][44][45]; (5) the characteristics of the metro complex network with weighted passenger flow and traffic flow, which are analyzed [4,8,46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%