2015
DOI: 10.31274/itaa_proceedings-180814-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Non-ownership Apparel Consumption through Online Fashion Product Rental Services: An Application of Institutional Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, tuxedos or prom dresses may only be used once or twice and thus, an investment may not pay off, whilst everyday garments may make ownership more economical and require different shopping practices. As such, this research agrees with past studies (Armstrong et al, 2015;Cook and Hodges, 2015) in that saving money is perceived as a key benefit of rentals, yet it is only reflected in special occasion wear. To explain, consumers generally feel that second-hand garments should be considerably cheaper when bought or rented, yet this may not always be the case for more everyday garments or accessories as subscription fees for rental services can be expensive.…”
Section: Drivers Of Fashion Rentingsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, tuxedos or prom dresses may only be used once or twice and thus, an investment may not pay off, whilst everyday garments may make ownership more economical and require different shopping practices. As such, this research agrees with past studies (Armstrong et al, 2015;Cook and Hodges, 2015) in that saving money is perceived as a key benefit of rentals, yet it is only reflected in special occasion wear. To explain, consumers generally feel that second-hand garments should be considerably cheaper when bought or rented, yet this may not always be the case for more everyday garments or accessories as subscription fees for rental services can be expensive.…”
Section: Drivers Of Fashion Rentingsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As such, fashion rentals may take away from the hedonistic aspects of shopping (or retail therapy). Although neither online nor offline rental services can replicate the hedonistic aspect of shopping, both forms create a novel experience for the user (Cook and Hodges, 2015). Further barriers identified in the literature are garment maintenance, hygiene and quality issues (Armstrong et al, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Consumer Perceptions Of Fashion Rentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rental companies such as Bag Borrow or Steal, Chic by Choice, Rent the Runway, Armarium, Mine for Nine, and subscription-based rental companies such as Letote, Gwynniebee, For Days, Bag Borrow or Steal, Rent the Runway, and Mine for Nine are some of the examples of companies offering these services. These services give access to unaffordable clothes, such as luxury designer clothes to the customers (Cook & Hodges 2015;Lang & Armstrong 2015). Moreover, they allow the fast-fashion consumers to refresh their wardrobes and try new styles (Okonkwo, 2010).…”
Section: Rental and Subscription-based-rental Fashion Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%