2023
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-rr5b0
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring non-toxic co-evolutionary docking

julio coll

Abstract: Drug-spaces of nine crystallographic protein / ligand models have been comparatively explored by including Toxicity Risk assessment during computational co-evolution. Tens of thousands children were randomly generated from parent ligands and iteratively selected for higher affinities, increased specificities and low Toxicity Risk using DataWarrior / Build Evolutionary Library algorithms, mimicking natural evolution. Only a few hours of co-evolution increased ~ 2-fold the numbers of non-toxic children. Top-lead… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Starting DataWarrior "Build Evolutionary Library" with a home-designed parent molecular pseudoligand The DataWarrior (DW) updated program was downloaded (https://openmolecules.org/datawarrior/download.html) following the details for Windows as described before 46,48 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Starting DataWarrior "Build Evolutionary Library" with a home-designed parent molecular pseudoligand The DataWarrior (DW) updated program was downloaded (https://openmolecules.org/datawarrior/download.html) following the details for Windows as described before 46,48 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high computer memories required to perform such co-evolutionary searches was higher than in our previously reported work [2][3][4][5] indicating that targeting the ORF8 interface cavities had enormous steric difficulties most probably due to the strong interdigitating amino acids of its monomer faces. The generation of children molecules during coevolution were controlled for molecular weight, hydrophobicity 6,7,[8][9][10][11] and toxicity risks to avoid unspecificities and/or toxic molecules 46 . The most accurate AutoDockVina (ADV) program quantitatively estimated their affinities, and explore for the possibilities of whole ORF8 wide docking cavities 47 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ADV algorithm was selected among the numerous alternative docking programs because of higher accuracies and ongoing improvements 27,28,36,37 . The PyRx/Obabel/ADV algorithms were adapted to large scale docking requirements 38,39 . Previous to ADV docking, non-toxic fitted-children DWBEL-conformers were minimized using the mmff94s+ force-field to conserve their 2D-structures.…”
Section: Confirmation By Gpgvhsv Adv-conformersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DataWarrior-Build Evolutionary Library (DW-BEL) algorithms were employed to generate tens of thousands of raw unique children from one parent molecule and select those fitting an initial protein-ligand cavity (fittedchildren). The Java's DW program was updated for Windows as described before (Table S1) 34,35 including some modifications to adapt to large number of runs. The initial parent molecules were selected from previously proposed KcsA ligands such as quaternary-ammonium compounds (qac) 14 , diacyl-glycerol (dga) 9 or user-designed pseudoligands.…”
Section: Generation Of Rather Than Screening For Kcsa Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 99%