Exploring organizational learning and experimental logistics development at the global fashion retailer H&M

Abstract

A logistics learning capability based on an experimental “test‐and‐learn” approach holds the key to unlock logistics operations as a major competitive weapon in the current landscape of retailing. The purpose of this study is to empirically explore the characteristics of such a logistics learning capability, and to describe the corresponding logistics development practices. The research is based on an action research approach conducted at the Swedish fashion retailer H&M. During a period of 18 months, data has been collected through observations, informal discussions and interviews, and findings have been refined in two major cycles. The case of H&M offers insights into real existing learning and development practices at a retail company that operates in a highly competitive and complex retail landscape, characterized in particular by its process towards improved omni‐channel practices. The findings elaborate the four logistics learning components of culture, structure, relationships, and speed. Furthermore, five of H&M's logistics development practices are described and defined as experimental logistics development. In contrast to traditional development processes in which analysis is followed by lengthy linear implementation and evaluation phases, these practices are characterized by an experimental, “test‐and‐learn” approach with short feedback loops and iterative development processes.

Foundations of knowledge management: intellectual structure and citation drivers of the Journal of Knowledge Management

“…This study will also discuss the factors that impact research in knowledge management. Indeed, this study can significantly help formulate future research agendas for the journal, and its findings can inform and guide new research in the field, thereby reaffirming the importance of pertinent building blocks such as agility (Ong and Tan, 2022), ambidexterity (Katou, 2021;Rossi et al, 2019), culture (Arora and Patro, 2021;Kimble, 2020;Memon et al, 2020;Sandberg and Abrahamsson, 2022;Schultz, 2022;Varshney, 2020), entrepreneurship (Brockman et al, 2021;Hussain et al, 2021;Liao et al, 2022;Nicotra et al, 2018;Orlando et al, 2021;Scuotto et al, 2020a;Sharma et al, 2021;Shi and Weber, 2021), externalities (Sutarto et al, 2022), innovation (Papa et al, 2021;Usai et al, 2020), intellectual capital (Carayannis et al, 2014;Paoloni et al, 2020;Schiavone et al, 2014), leadership (Islam et al, 2021;Lacan, 2021), quality management (Abd Samad and Othman, 2022) and technology advancement (Campanella et al, 2020;Del Giudice et al, 2019;Di Vaio et al, 2020;Sajid et al, 2022) in future efforts to develop and extend understanding of knowledge management (Caputo et al, 2021;Rossi et al, 2020;Scuotto et al, 2020B) for organizational excellence (Kopelman, 2022). More importantly, the findings of this study will assist the editorial board of JKM in curating and shaping future directions of the journal around the thematic clusters, which will, in turn, help develop the field of knowledge management.…”

Thirty years of product and brand management research: a retrospective review of the Journal of Product and Brand Management using bibliometric analysis

“…Paradigm shift in retailing Over the past few decades, the internet and information technology have profoundly changed the retail sector. The dominance of internet channels in several sectors in particular has driven a huge number of retailers to embrace multi-channel strategies (Beck and Rygl, 2015;Harris et al, 2018;Sandberg and Abrahamsson, 2022). Customers benefit from multichannel commerce since it provides them with various contact points, such as online and physical stores.…”

A general theory of de‐internationalization

“…More often than not, firms encounter tribulations caused by complexities in an increasingly DVUCA international business environment, leading them to consider and undertake devolutionary steps in international operations (e.g., foreign divestment, export withdrawals). In other words, firms do not only internationalize (Cardoso & Forte, 2020; Rwehumbiza, 2021; Sandberg & Abrahamsson, 2022; Wang & Alon, 2020), but also de‐internationalize, which can happen in a particular foreign market (e.g., China–US trade war) or across international markets (e.g., border closure and industry shutdown due to COVID‐19) (Lim, 2021, 2022; Lim & Mandrinos, 2020; Mandrinos et al., 2022).…”