2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.2.10529/v3
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Patient-Reported Barriers to Advance Care Planning in Family Practice

Abstract: Background: Although patient-centred care has become increasingly important across all medical specialties, when it comes to end of life care, research has shown that treatments ordered are not often concordant with people’s expressed preferences. Patient and family engagement in Advance Care Planning (ACP) in the primary care setting could improve the concordance between patients’ wishes and the healthcare received when patients cannot speak for themselves. The aim of this study was to better understand the b… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, only about one-inthree US adults have completed an advance directive, owing to multiple barriers for both patients and physicians, including, but not limited to: (1) lack of understanding about ACP; (2) insufficient time during physician appointments to discuss ACP; (3) a belief that ACP does not apply to young or healthy patients; (4) reliance on family or physician-led decision-making over autonomous decision-making; and (5) discomfort with talking about death and dying. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Online discussions about ACP may have a significant impact on people's perceptions and behaviors related to ACP. Although the online completion of advance directives has increased nearly fivefold during the COVID-19 pandemic, no prior studies have examined online discussions about ACP during the pandemic in relation to discussions about LSIs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only about one-inthree US adults have completed an advance directive, owing to multiple barriers for both patients and physicians, including, but not limited to: (1) lack of understanding about ACP; (2) insufficient time during physician appointments to discuss ACP; (3) a belief that ACP does not apply to young or healthy patients; (4) reliance on family or physician-led decision-making over autonomous decision-making; and (5) discomfort with talking about death and dying. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Online discussions about ACP may have a significant impact on people's perceptions and behaviors related to ACP. Although the online completion of advance directives has increased nearly fivefold during the COVID-19 pandemic, no prior studies have examined online discussions about ACP during the pandemic in relation to discussions about LSIs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%