Exploring perceptions of healthcare technologies enabled by artificial intelligence: an online, scenario-based survey

Abstract

Background Healthcare is expected to increasingly integrate technologies enabled by artificial intelligence (AI) into patient care. Understanding perceptions of these tools is essential to successful development and adoption. This exploratory study gauged participants’ level of openness, concern, and perceived benefit associated with AI-driven healthcare technologies. We also explored socio-demographic, health-related, and psychosocial correlates of these perceptions. Methods We developed a measure depicting six AI-driven technologies that either diagnose, predict, or suggest treatment. We administered the measure via an online survey to adults (N = 936) in the United States using MTurk, a crowdsourcing platform. Participants indicated their level of openness to using the AI technology in the healthcare scenario. Items reflecting potential concerns and benefits associated with each technology accompanied the scenarios. Participants rated the extent that the statements of concerns and benefits influenced their perception of favorability toward the technology. Participants completed measures of socio-demographics, health variables, and psychosocial variables such as trust in the healthcare system and trust in technology. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the concern and benefit items identified two factors representing overall level of concern and perceived benefit. Descriptive analyses examined levels of openness, concern, and perceived benefit. Correlational analyses explored associations of socio-demographic, health, and psychosocial variables with openness, concern, and benefit scores while multivariable regression models examined these relationships concurrently. Results Participants were moderately open to AI-driven healthcare technologies (M = 3.1/5.0 ± 0.9), but there was variation depending on the type of application, and the statements of concerns and benefits swayed views. Trust in the healthcare system and trust in technology were the strongest, most consistent correlates of openness, concern, and perceived benefit. Most other socio-demographic, health-related, and psychosocial variables were less strongly, or not, associated, but multivariable models indicated some personality characteristics (e.g., conscientiousness and agreeableness) and socio-demographics (e.g., full-time employment, age, sex, and race) were modestly related to perceptions. Conclusions Participants’ openness appears tenuous, suggesting early promotion strategies and experiences with novel AI technologies may strongly influence views, especially if implementation of AI technologies increases or undermines trust. The exploratory nature of these findings warrants additional research.

Patient Perspectives on a Targeted Text Messaging Campaign to Encourage Screening for Diabetes: Qualitative Study

“…It was apparent that many of the participants placed a great deal of trust in their provider and that language that made them feel like the provider was more involved was desirable and elevated the perceived benefits of HbA 1c screening because it made them feel like “my doctor thinks I should [get the test].” Patients’ trust in their provider is positively associated with protective health behaviors, better quality of life, and satisfaction with care [ 35 ], and it is possible that the relationship built from face-to-face interactions may extend to or modify automated mHealth interactions with health care organizations in general. This is similar to findings indicating that trust in the health care system is 1 of the most important aspects of patient acceptance of and perceived benefits from artificial intelligence [ 36 ]. We might anticipate that those with established and positive relationships with their providers may engage more with text messages and other automated methods.…”

Attitudes and perception of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A cross-sectional survey among patients

“…Nevertheless, these influencing factors are certainly not new and are consistent with several previous publications. 58 , 67 – 69 This divergent perception can lead to reduced usage of novel technologies in certain groups and is commonly described as ‘digital divide’ or ‘digital gap’. While many think of these key words in terms of global phenomena such as limited internet access in developing countries, many authors emphasize that sociodemographic factors within a developed society can influence access to novel digital technologies as well.…”

A Process Framework for Ethically Deploying Artificial Intelligence in Oncology

“…It Got an A” in The New York Times 7 and studies demonstrating that a cancer survival prediction tool is among the most anticipated uses of health care AI. 8 Patients have high levels of interest and trust in using AI to detect breast 9 and skin cancer. 2 Oncologists' support for AI, however, appears less robust.…”