Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2396761.2396848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring personal impact for group recommendation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
87
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several model-based methods have been proposed for group recommendation. Social influences [23,11,8,9] have been explored. For example, Liu et al [11] proposed a personal impact topic (PIT) model for group recommendation and an extended model with social information.…”
Section: Group Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Several model-based methods have been proposed for group recommendation. Social influences [23,11,8,9] have been explored. For example, Liu et al [11] proposed a personal impact topic (PIT) model for group recommendation and an extended model with social information.…”
Section: Group Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social influences [23,11,8,9] have been explored. For example, Liu et al [11] proposed a personal impact topic (PIT) model for group recommendation and an extended model with social information. PIT builds an author-topic model and differentiates personal impacts for group decision by introducing a personal impact variable to represent the relative probability to influence the group's decision in the PIT model.…”
Section: Group Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As pointed out in [16], to obtain adequate group recommendations it is not only necessary to model users' individual preferences, but also to understand how a decision among group members is reached. While research on group decision making [31] is concerned with collaboratively making choices, focusing on the social process and the outcome, these aspects have mostly not been addressed in the development of group recommender systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%