Exploring Polysemy Through Prototypical Theory for Teaching Legal English in Contracts

Suman, Luhach; Garima, Tiwari

doi:10.26634/jelt.10.4.17081

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This inaccurate understanding of the right usage of polysemous legal terms in the initial years usually continues in their later profession. Vague terms and ambiguities often become the root causes of contract interpretation disputes (Luhach & Tiwari, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Problems of Identifying Lexical and Syntactic Features of Legal Documents by Undergraduate EFL Students

Al-Jarf¹

2023

jpda

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Students majoring in translation at the College of Languages and Translation take a stylistics course (3 hours per week) in the 5th semester of the translation program. The course aims to introduce students to the stylistic features of different genres in English such as journalese, advertisements, commercial, scientific, and legal texts. The present study aims to investigate ESL translation students’ ability to comprehend and identify the stylistic features of legal documents, to find out the stylistic features that are easy to identify, and those that are difficult to identify. Sixty EFL junior students enrolled in a Stylistics course took a test which consisted of an English legal (notarial) text and asked them to identify its lexical and syntactic features. Analysis of the subjects’ responses showed that the features that they could identify were: Use of legal verbs (69%); prefixing and suffixing of prepositions (63%;) prepositional/adverbial phrases (57%); long complex sentences (52%); coordination of synonyms (doublets) (52%); statements (22%); no adjectives (10%); few pronouns (8%); use of technical vocabulary and emphatic auxiliaries (7% each); use of passive structures, relative clauses and scarce use of pronoun reference (5% each); use adverbs and putting adverbs in an unusual position (3% each); rare pronoun reference, descriptive adjectives, few adjectives, long words, sentence with unusual order, and long nominal clauses (1.6% each). These percentages reflect the difficulty level of the different lexical and syntactic features of the legal text and features with which the students have comprehension difficulties. The lower the percentage, the more difficult the feature is. Difficulties in processing the notarial text may be attributed to lack of linguistic competence and unfamiliarity with the notarial text structure. Recommendations for instructional techniques that would help enhance the students’ ability to identify and comprehend the lexical and syntactic structures of legal texts are given.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Problems of Identifying Lexical and Syntactic Features of Legal Documents by Undergraduate EFL Students

Al-Jarf¹

2023

jpda

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Exploring Polysemy Through Prototypical Theory for Teaching Legal English in Contracts

Cited by 1 publication

References 10 publications

Problems of Identifying Lexical and Syntactic Features of Legal Documents by Undergraduate EFL Students

Problems of Identifying Lexical and Syntactic Features of Legal Documents by Undergraduate EFL Students

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About