2024
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-51903-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring potential causal associations between autoimmune diseases and colorectal cancer using bidirectional Mendelian randomization

Lu Chen,
Feifan Wang,
Hua Zhang
et al.

Abstract: Several observational studies have revealed an association between autoimmune diseases (AIDs) and colorectal cancer (CRC), although their causal association remained controversial. Therefore, our study used a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to verify the causal association between AIDs and CRC. We employed three common MR approaches, including inverse variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, and MR-Egger methods, to assess the causal association between type 1 diabetes (T1D), systemic lupus e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cochran's Q test was conducted, with P < 0.05 indicating heterogeneity 50 . Additionally, to identify SNPs with potential effects, we also conducted a leave-one-out analysis to assess whether a single SNP is responsible for the causal estimate or whether it is a source of bias 51 .…”
Section: Pleiotropy and Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cochran's Q test was conducted, with P < 0.05 indicating heterogeneity 50 . Additionally, to identify SNPs with potential effects, we also conducted a leave-one-out analysis to assess whether a single SNP is responsible for the causal estimate or whether it is a source of bias 51 .…”
Section: Pleiotropy and Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cochran's Q test was conducted to quantify the heterogeneity of individual causal effects (P value < 0.05 indicating heterogeneity) 52 . Additionally, to identify SNPs with potential effects, we also conducted a leave-one-out analysis to assess whether a single SNP is responsible for the causal estimate or whether it is a source of bias 53 .…”
Section: Pleiotropy and Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%