Exploring Processes in Small Software Companies: A Systematic Review

Tripathi, Nirnaya; Annanperä, Elina; Oivo, Markku; Liukkunen, Kari

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-38980-6_12

Cited by 10 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Two authors of this paper jointly executed the process. Specifically, the sixth author took the responsibility for searching the articles from the scientific database, while the first author executed the Google search process, since author had database search experienced from his previous literature review work [6]. The objective was for the first author to guide and check the sixth author's process if a discrepancy emerged.…”

Section: Literature Search Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, to systematically search scientific literature, the StArt tool 6 was used, since this is designed to conduct systematic literature reviews, as it incorporates all the important steps needed to perform the literature review process. The tool was also used by the coauthors in their previous study [6]. To rigorously search for gray literature, the steps used by Bajwa et al [25] were included, and thus, the Google Chrome internet browser was used.…”

Section: Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Software startups are important for the economy due to their potential for creating jobs and adding value to domestic products on a global scale [5]. However, due to their characteristics, including limited resources and staff with limited product development experience, product development occurs with irregular software engineering practices, and such practices often depend on startups' contexts [6]. In software engineering, using unreliable RE techniques can cause software projects to fail.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In RE, including relevant and experienced stakeholders and using standardized processes to collect requirements are vital elements. [1,7] Small-scale companies face many challenges caused by substandard or basic RE practices, such as the needs to update various product components during required changes, communication and coordination issues, confusing project overviews, and writing difficulties regarding the understood requirements [8,6]. In the context of software startups, due to their small sizes and their staffs' limited software development experience, RE processes are basic [9,10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/home.jsp3 https://www.scopus.com/home.uri4 https://apps.webofknowledge.com 5 http://www.google.com6 http://lapes.dc.ufscar.br/resources-and-downloads/tools 7 https://www.seoquake.com/index.html…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

An anatomy of requirements engineering in software startups using multi-vocal literature and case survey

Tripathi

Klotins

Prikladnicki

et al. 2018

Journal of Systems and Software

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. Highlights • Requirements engineering is a key process for startup's product development. • With 36 primary articles and 80 cases, the process is deeply examined.

show abstract

Section: Literature Search Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%