Exploring Public Perception of Non-native Species from a Visions of Nature Perspective

Verbrugge, Laura; Born, R.J.G. van den; Lenders, H.J.R.

doi:10.1007/s00267-013-0170-1

Cited by 113 publications

(119 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

100

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This is consistent with previous research on the public's Human and Nature relationship (Van den Born 2006; Verbrugge et al 2013). People adhering to a master over nature relationship feel that humans stand above nature and can exploit nature for human benefit.…”

Section: Visions Of Naturesupporting

confidence: 91%

“…Apparently, respondents in general do not clearly see differences between these positions. Previous quantitative research also showed similarities in the adherence to the partner with nature and participant in nature relationship (De Groot et al 2011;Ganzevoort and Van den Born, 2014;Verbrugge et al 2013). In qualitative research, however, respondents do distinguish between partner and participant positions (Van den Born 2008).…”

Section: Visions Of Naturementioning

confidence: 94%

“…The stakeholders' visions of nature are relevant to understand the perceptions of large carnivores, and can predict preferred management strategies (Verbrugge et al 2013 (2014); Van den Born, 2006, 2007. The HaN scale has been used before in understanding public perceptions, for instance towards non-native species (Verbrugge et al 2013) and on public support for flood risk management strategies (De Groot 2012).…”

Section: Visions Of Naturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The HaN scale has been used before in understanding public perceptions, for instance towards non-native species (Verbrugge et al 2013) and on public support for flood risk management strategies (De Groot 2012).…”

Section: Visions Of Naturementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Analysing stakeholders’ perceptions of wolf, lynx and fox in a Dutch riverine area

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the last decades, populations of large carnivores have been making a spectacular return, especially in the USA and Western Europe. These population recoveries result partially from protective legislation and reintroduction programs, but possibly also from land use changes and from large carnivores adapting to human environments. Although public support for large carnivore protection seems to be growing, some stakeholders still have a negative perception of large carnivores because of their alleged negative impacts on livestock and humans. Perceptions of large carnivores are partly determined by underlying visions of nature which differ between stakeholder groups. We therefore examined the relationship between different stakeholder groups' perceptions of nature and the presence of the fox (Vulpes vulpes), and the possible establishment of the wolf (Canis lupus) and lynx (Lynx lynx) in a Dutch riverine landscape. Stakeholder groups comprised the general public, farmers, scientists and nature conservationists. Although perceptions of large carnivores differed significantly across the stakeholder groups, public support for large carnivores was generally higher than expected. Farmers show the most negative perception, especially regarding the wolf and lynx. This is related to their vision 123Biodivers Conserv (2017) 26:1723-1743 DOI 10.1007/s10531-017-1329 of nature, which is more strongly aligned with mastery over nature compared to other stakeholder groups. Scientists, prominent adherers of stewardship of nature, appear to have the most positive perception of large carnivores. Despite these differences in visions of nature, respondents generally adhere to the stewardship of nature relationship. This could be a good starting point to find common ground when disputes arise over large carnivores.

show abstract

Section: Visions Of Naturesupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Visions Of Naturementioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Visions Of Naturementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Visions Of Naturementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Analysing stakeholders’ perceptions of wolf, lynx and fox in a Dutch riverine area

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the details and extent of the perception of such risks are inherently highly variable between individuals (Slimak and Dietz 2006;Vanderhoeven et al 2011;Gozlan et al 2013), are largely species dependent (Sharp et al 2011;Gozlan et al 2013;Verbrugge et al 2013), and do not always correlate with actual ecological risk (Andreu et al 2009;Gozlan et al 2013). People are generally poor at assessing risks (Wachinger et al 2013), frequently exaggerating some whilst downplaying others (Clayton and Myers 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Drivers of risk perceptions about the invasive non-native plant Japanese knotweed in domestic gardens

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How people perceive risks posed by invasive non-native plants (INNP) can influence attitudes and consequently likely influence behavioural decisions. Although some drivers of risk perception for INNP have been identified, research has not determined those for INNP in domestic gardens. This is concerning as domestic gardens are where people most commonly encounter INNP, and where impacts can be particularly acute. Using a survey approach, this study determined the drivers of perceptions of risk of INNP in domestic gardens and which risks most concern people. Japanese knotweed Fallopia japonica, in Cornwall, UK, where it is a problematic INNP in domestic gardens, was used as a case study. Possible drivers of risk were chosen a priori based on variables previously found to be important for environmental risks. Participants perceived Japanese knotweed to be less frequent on domestic property in Cornwall if their occupation involved the housing market, if they had not had Japanese knotweed in their own garden, if they did not know of Japanese knotweed within 5 km of their home, or if they were educated to degree level. Participants who thought that the consequences of Japanese knotweed being present on domestic property could be more severe had occupations that involved the housing market, knew of Japanese knotweed within 5 km of their home, or were older. Although concern about the damage Japanese knotweed could do to the structure of a property was reported as the second highest motivation to control it by the majority of participants, the perception of threat from this risk was rated as relatively low. The results of this study have implications for policy, risk communication, and garden management decisions. For example, there is a need for policy that provides support and resources for people to manage INNP in their local area. To reduce the impact and spread of INNP we highlight the need for clear and accurate risk communication within discourse about this issue. The drivers identified in this study could be used to target awareness campaigns to limit the development of over-or under-inflated risk perceptions.

show abstract

The role of species charisma in biological invasions

Jarić

Courchamp

Correia

et al. 2020

Frontiers in Ecol & Environ

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Species charisma, understood as a set of species characteristics and their perception that affect people's attitudes and behaviors, is a highly relevant concept for invasion science, with implications across all stages of the invasion process. However, the concept of invasive alien species (IAS) charisma has not yet been systematically investigated. Here, we discuss this concept, provide a set of recommendations for further research and highlight management implications. We review how charisma affects the processes associated with biological invasions and IAS management, including: effects on species introductions and spread, media portrayals, public perceptions of species management, research attention, and active public involvement in research and management. Explicit consideration of IAS charisma is critical to improve understanding of the drivers of people's attitudes towards particular IAS and planned management measures and strategies, and to implement programs aiming to influence stakeholder perceptions and behavior and to strengthen public engagement. In a nutshell • We discuss the concept of charismatic invasive alien species (IAS), highlight management implications and provide a set of recommendations for further research. • The charisma of IAS might influence all stages of the invasion process, and both charisma and its influence can vary over time and space. • It is a potential hindrance to management actions by affecting public support and contributing to conflicts. • We explore the concept of IAS charisma and its effects on biological invasions and management, including species introductions, media portrayal, public perceptions, opposition to management, research effort and public participation in research and management.

show abstract

Exploring Public Perception of Non-native Species from a Visions of Nature Perspective

Cited by 113 publications

References 42 publications

Analysing stakeholders’ perceptions of wolf, lynx and fox in a Dutch riverine area

Analysing stakeholders’ perceptions of wolf, lynx and fox in a Dutch riverine area

Drivers of risk perceptions about the invasive non-native plant Japanese knotweed in domestic gardens

The role of species charisma in biological invasions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About