2009
DOI: 10.1080/01972240802587588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Qualitative Sharing Practices of Social Metadata: Expanding the Attention Economy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…How are reciprocal rules and patterns manifested? From a number of preliminary studies (Skågeby, 2008(Skågeby, , 2009 it can be concluded that, social bonding values are many times conveyed via sociocontextual metadata attached to media objects and collections of media objects (such as comments, tags, public friends lists and status notifications). It becomes interesting to see how the possibility to contribute and receive such metadata bears impact on overall sharing behaviors and practices particularly as there is a continuous addition of functionality to the social layers of media sharing (Shirky, 2003;Kaye, 2004;Mello, 2004;Roush, 2005), creating more potential for socially bonding media sharing (i.e.…”
Section: Discussion: Gifting Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…How are reciprocal rules and patterns manifested? From a number of preliminary studies (Skågeby, 2008(Skågeby, , 2009 it can be concluded that, social bonding values are many times conveyed via sociocontextual metadata attached to media objects and collections of media objects (such as comments, tags, public friends lists and status notifications). It becomes interesting to see how the possibility to contribute and receive such metadata bears impact on overall sharing behaviors and practices particularly as there is a continuous addition of functionality to the social layers of media sharing (Shirky, 2003;Kaye, 2004;Mello, 2004;Roush, 2005), creating more potential for socially bonding media sharing (i.e.…”
Section: Discussion: Gifting Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a theoretical point of view, this illustrates that an object with a fairly stable exchange value can have different bonding value depending on the sorts of relationships in which it occurs (which may in turn impact on the exchange value). The effect of this impact is described in more detail in Skågeby (2009).…”
Section: Discussion: Gifting Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Human preferences, tastes, desires, and interests are profoundly maneuvered by the interface features which direct online behaviour, while users' behavioural metadata in turn help to reconfigure the very algorithms structuring the site. Social metadata, such as tags, comments, friends lists, and groups, are used to personalize media objects and their relations to people and other media objects (Skageby 2009). It is not until the photo or object is tagged or commented upon that relationship intentions become manifest, and yet, these actions are often executed unconsciously.…”
Section: Technology Producing Socialitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent focus on user‐generated content and social web communities leads to massive availability of social metadata : content sharing and social bookmarking sites, weblogs and other publishing tools introduce tagging, annotation, rating, commenting and discussion mechanisms, which can also be applied to educational resources. Skågeby (2009) lists different purposes for social metadata: sharing, recommendation, filtering, communication or personal organisation of content. Usually, social metadata does not follow complex structures.…”
Section: Classes Of Metadatamentioning
confidence: 99%