Exploring research relationships and other ethical challenges of participatory visual research in remote environments

Abstract

This critical reflection provides fellow researchers with insights into the ethical challenges of using visual methods in remote environments. We draw on Fine’s notion of ‘working the hyphens’ to explore the complexities of studying a leadership program for women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics and medicine (STEMM) on a ship in Antarctica. We reflect on how our researcher identities and relationships with participants shaped the research process and emergent ethical tensions. For instance, we discuss ethical issues that arose in relation to the contextual and relational aspects of the environment including psychological and physical demands of research participation in Antarctica, privacy and isolation in remote environments, and rapport. We also discuss issues related to participant-produced video diaries specifically including consent, confidentiality and participant safety. To conclude, we highlight implications for visual research in other remote settings.

Participatory Research: Still a One-Sided Research Agenda?

“…The glorification of methods used more generally in social sciences, insisted on by both funders and scholars, may push researchers to come up with new 'innovative methods', or as they are sometimes referred in the literature, 'creative methods' (Wiles, Crow, & Pain, 2011). These methods may involve arts-based techniques, including theatre, photography, video recording, diary writing, drawing, using software tools, among others (Castleden, Garvin, & First Nation, 2008;Erel, Reynolds, & Kaptani, 2017;Nash & Moore, 2018;Parry, 2015). Some researchers may also employ traditional methods, such as surveys, interviews and focus groups, as long as they are participatory in their approach to data collection (Letiecq & Schmalzbauer, 2012;Wieland et al, 2012).…”