Exploring Science Identity Development of Women in Physics and Physical Sciences in Higher Education

Abstract

This study investigates women’s science identity development in physics and the physical sciences in higher education through a gender perspective. It arises from the real-life sociological issue of women’s lower level of participation in physics and physical sciences in Ireland, where the gender gap is the highest of all science disciplines, according to the Higher Education Authority (HEA) reports of recent years. Twenty-nine undergraduate, graduate students, and postdoctoral researchers from four Dublin universities were interviewed to achieve an in-depth understanding of gender and science issues from their standpoints. The focus was on how they constitute their identities as a ‘scientist’ in relation to their gender. The result of this study illustrates a variety of possible science identity constitutions of women both from an individual and collective identity perspective. Understanding women’s science identity development help brings a general view about developing a more welcoming and flexible science culture for individuals who think they do not fit well or who are left outside of the certain prevailing norms in the scientific climate. It also can allow seeking a way of challenging and changing the predominant culture and the prevailing masculine norms in doing science.

Investigating Differences in Experts’ Chemistry Knowledge Structures and Comparing Them to Those of General Chemistry Students

“…As the NCEs knew that this study was about revealing chemistry knowledge structures, it is likely that only those who use chemistry extensively in their studies chose to participate in the study. So, it can be argued that research experience, among other factors, is influential in shaping one’s knowledge system, conceptual understanding, and science identity. ,− …”

Programmatic innovations that accord with the retention of women in STEM careers

“…Many of the innovative elements reinforce the development of interpersonal and intrapersonal factors known to affect retention in the STEM disciplines, such as science (STEM) identity and sense of belonging. As science identity is predictive of longer-term persistence in STEM-related fields (Eren, 2021), and sense of nonbelonging is cited as a reason for "leaving" the sciences (especially for women, Lewis et al, 2017), these aims are essential to the presented study and well-supported in the literature. Specifically, Estrada et al (2018) note that completing multiple semesters of research and/or internship within STEM correlates strongly with establishing identity within STEM.…”

“…There are various potential reasons for this continued gender disparity in the physical sciences, including stereotypes relating the practice of physical science to hyper-masculinity (Good et al, 2008;Smyth and Nosek, 2015;Francis et al, 2017), or a lack of perceived representation of women or women role models in the field, in turn leading to issues of belonging and fit (Nelson and Brammer, 2010;Good et al, 2012;Gisler et al, 2018). There are also individuallevel factors to consider, including women's lower self-efficacy for physics (not coupled with lower objective skills, Kalender et al, 2020), their experienced science identity (Trujillo and Tanner, 2014;Eren, 2021), or a perceived lack of opportunity to fulfill communal career goals, which tend to be valued more by women (Diekman et al, 2017).…”

Are Employment Trajectories of STEM Doctoral Degree Holders Gender-Specific? Evidence from a Large German Technical University

“…We expect that the employment context during doctoral training shapes job-relevant knowledge acquisition, access to networks, and researcher identity formation processes, that are plausibly connected to career decisions. To investigate potential gender effects, we control for field-specific differences (Cheryan et al 2017;Eren 2021; Schwerter/Ilg 2021) 1 and motherhood (e.g., van Anders 2004; Schubert/Engelage 2010; Koenig et al 2021).…”