2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring short-term longitudinal effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on environmentalism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

9
52
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
9
52
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the association between Trump favorability and climate change skepticism followed both a direct and an indirect path, through neoliberal elements, such as negative attitudes towards Government‐led redistribution policies. The effects found for attitudes towards Trump could be considered consistent with previous findings that established reliable associations of right‐wing ideology and neoliberal elements with climate change skepticism (e.g., Klinsky et al., ; McCright et al., ; Stanley et al., ). Results appeared also consistent with the moderating role of interest in politics in further polarizing environmental issues and attitudes towards environmental policies (Baldassarri & Gelman, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, the association between Trump favorability and climate change skepticism followed both a direct and an indirect path, through neoliberal elements, such as negative attitudes towards Government‐led redistribution policies. The effects found for attitudes towards Trump could be considered consistent with previous findings that established reliable associations of right‐wing ideology and neoliberal elements with climate change skepticism (e.g., Klinsky et al., ; McCright et al., ; Stanley et al., ). Results appeared also consistent with the moderating role of interest in politics in further polarizing environmental issues and attitudes towards environmental policies (Baldassarri & Gelman, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, we expected that at least a portion of the attitudes towards Trump effect (and of its interaction with interest in politics) would be mediated by an antiredistributionist stance that represents a neoliberal feature of Trump's policies. Such mediation would lend support to the notion that what is at stake for conservatives or American populists in opposing proenvironmental policies is not just the right of humans to exploit nature, as suggested by some scholars (Dohnt, Hodson, & Leite, ; Milfont et al., ), but rather the hierarchical inequalities embedded in the dominant social system (primacy of production, capitalist system, economic freedom, unrestrained consumption), and in the traditional way of life (Jylhä & Akrami, ; Milfont & Sibley, ; Rossen et al., ; Stanley et al., ). Therefore, we anticipated that: H3a: Aversion to redistribution will mediate the association of attitudes towards Trump with climate change skepticism; and (H3b) the shape of the direct and indirect effects will vary as a function of interest in politics (see Figure ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is considerable debate regarding the directional relations among personality traits and political attitudes and ideologies (see Hatemi & McDermott, 2016, for a review). To date, empirical evidence supports personality as a prospective predictor of future political attitudes (e.g., Block & Block, 2006) and vice versa (Stanley, Wilson, & Milfont, 2017). Additionally, evidence suggests that the covariance between political ideology and personality is due to a common latent genetic predisposition that mutually influences both rather than one causing the other (Hatemi & Verhulst, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%