Handbook of European Social Policy 2017
DOI: 10.4337/9781783476466.00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring social policy ideas and language

Abstract: The literature on the role of ideas in public and social policy has expanded dramatically over the last two decades (

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likely owing to the Anglophone orientation of present-day academia, one critically important dimension of security is systematically overlooked, namely, that 'security' does not necessarily simply mean 'security' across language spheres. This is of course not a new idea in itself, and conceptual history has done much to trace the origins and changing meanings of a great number of political concepts and has generally tended to find that apparently universal terms (including 'security') contain meanings that are hard to translate and transfer between contexts (Béland and Petersen, 2017;Koselleck, 2002). Paying attention to the emic meanings of security adds not just comparative empirical nuance, but potentially also theoretical substance: it implies not only the central constructivist impulse of securitization -that any object could, in principle, be framed under the headline of security -but also that the very yardsticks for what security even means are themselves situated and produced within specific social realities (Bubandt, 2005;Eriksen, 2010;Holbraad and Pedersen, 2013).…”
Section: The Meanings Of Security and Why They Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likely owing to the Anglophone orientation of present-day academia, one critically important dimension of security is systematically overlooked, namely, that 'security' does not necessarily simply mean 'security' across language spheres. This is of course not a new idea in itself, and conceptual history has done much to trace the origins and changing meanings of a great number of political concepts and has generally tended to find that apparently universal terms (including 'security') contain meanings that are hard to translate and transfer between contexts (Béland and Petersen, 2017;Koselleck, 2002). Paying attention to the emic meanings of security adds not just comparative empirical nuance, but potentially also theoretical substance: it implies not only the central constructivist impulse of securitization -that any object could, in principle, be framed under the headline of security -but also that the very yardsticks for what security even means are themselves situated and produced within specific social realities (Bubandt, 2005;Eriksen, 2010;Holbraad and Pedersen, 2013).…”
Section: The Meanings Of Security and Why They Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparative social policy scholarship, the emergence of certain aspects of social policy language, and its core concepts, have been scrutinized and reflected upon as historically contingent, identifying the ‘ideational baggage’ particular concepts may carry. Underlying this is the insight that ‘the emergence of new terms and concepts, such as “social insurance”, “welfare state” and “social security”, has played a key role in shaping both policy decisions and the political battles over them’ (Béland and Petersen, 2017: 21). For instance, Nowotny (1991) and O’Connor (2001) both demonstrate that how European societies have generally treated the poor has changed historically in accordance with changes in dominant social ideas.…”
Section: Scholarship: the Reflexive Groundworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the number of actors increases, so too does the complexity of the possibilities for informal and dynamic alliances. Kingdon (1995) goes further, suggesting that, given the number of different ways to define problems and the nature of competition between politicians jockeying for advantage, along with the vagaries of policy-making, the sheer number of possible directions of travel yield a process that can be more accurately described as 'organised anarchy' (referred to elsewhere as the 'garbage can model') (see also Béland and Petersen, 2017).…”
Section: Articulating and Measuring Job Quality In Eu Employment Policymentioning
confidence: 99%