2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iccvw.2017.90
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Spatial Context for 3D Semantic Segmentation of Point Clouds

Abstract: Deep learning approaches have made tremendous progress in the field of semantic segmentation over the past few years. However, most current approaches operate in the 2D image space. Direct semantic segmentation of unstructured 3D point clouds is still an open research problem. The recently proposed PointNet architecture presents an interesting step ahead in that it can operate on unstructured point clouds, achieving encouraging segmentation results. However, it subdivides the input points into a grid of blocks… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
195
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
195
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Models based on KD-trees [37,94,20] spatially partition the points using kd-trees and then recursively aggregate them. RNNs [31,89,17,41] are applied to point clouds by the assumption that "order matters" [72] and achieve promising results on semantic segmentation tasks but the quality of the learned features is not clear.…”
Section: Deep Learning On Point Cloudsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models based on KD-trees [37,94,20] spatially partition the points using kd-trees and then recursively aggregate them. RNNs [31,89,17,41] are applied to point clouds by the assumption that "order matters" [72] and achieve promising results on semantic segmentation tasks but the quality of the learned features is not clear.…”
Section: Deep Learning On Point Cloudsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mean IoU Overall accuracy(%) PointNet [4] 47.71 78.62 A-SCN [33] 52.72 81.59 SEGCloud [27] 48.92 -G+RCU [8] 49.7 81.1 RSNet [12] 56.47 -Engelmann et al [9] 58 IoU of our model is 56.63% and the overall accuracy is 84.13%. Some of the experimental results are shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…6. Our model demonstrates better segmentation results compared with PointNet [26], MS+CU (2) [8], G+RCU [8], 3P-RNN [42], SPGraph [15], and TangentConv [35]. However, our model performs slightly worse than PointCNN [18] due to their non-overlapping block sampling strategy with paddings which we do not use.…”
Section: Semantic Segmentation In Scenesmentioning
confidence: 92%