2009
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsp224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring spatial non-stationarity of fisheries survey data using geographically weighted regression (GWR): an example from the Northwest Atlantic

Abstract: Windle, M. J. S., Rose, G. A., Devillers, R., and Fortin, M-J. 2010. Exploring spatial non-stationarity of fisheries survey data using geographically weighted regression (GWR): an example from the Northwest Atlantic. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 67: 145–154. Analyses of fisheries data have traditionally been performed under the implicit assumption that ecological relationships do not vary within management areas (i.e. assuming spatially stationary processes). We question this assumption using a local mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
69
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jordan 2006, Cho and Gimpel 2009, Lee et al 2009); and (5) ecology and environmental science (e.g. Svenning et al 2009, Windle 2010). However, for GWR studies involving transportation, river/stream networks or some complex terrain conditions, ED metrics may fail to reflect true spatial proximity, and instead, non-ED metrics should be considered, such as road ND, TT, water distance or landscape distance.…”
Section: Geographically Weighted Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jordan 2006, Cho and Gimpel 2009, Lee et al 2009); and (5) ecology and environmental science (e.g. Svenning et al 2009, Windle 2010). However, for GWR studies involving transportation, river/stream networks or some complex terrain conditions, ED metrics may fail to reflect true spatial proximity, and instead, non-ED metrics should be considered, such as road ND, TT, water distance or landscape distance.…”
Section: Geographically Weighted Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…spatial non-stationarity) in the relationships under study (Windle et al 2010). Spatial stationarity implies that the parameters of a process (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GWR can also be used to explore the scale dependency of ecological interactions by systematically varying the bandwidth size of the spatial kernel at each observation. This technique has been applied to determine the scale at which a species−environment relationship becomes stationary (Osborne et al 2007, Windle et al 2010, Miller & Hanham 2011, Gao et al 2012) and is potentially an important step in building multi-scale predictive models (Graf et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental principle of GWR is kernel regression, through which model coefficients are determined by neighboring subsets of training samples, and therefore, the problem of spatial nonstationarity can be effectively addressed. However, careful attention should be given to the potential collinearity relationship due to the local nature of GWR [55,56]. As a result, it is usually recommended as a supplementary exploratory technique with global regression models for exploring the variability between variables within a geographical extent [52,56].…”
Section: Comparison Of Sar Lsr and Gwrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, careful attention should be given to the potential collinearity relationship due to the local nature of GWR [55,56]. As a result, it is usually recommended as a supplementary exploratory technique with global regression models for exploring the variability between variables within a geographical extent [52,56]. In contrast, SAR is developed using the entire training dataset, though neighboring samples are assigned with greater weights.…”
Section: Comparison Of Sar Lsr and Gwrmentioning
confidence: 99%