2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring structure and function of sensory cortex with 7 T MRI

Abstract: (max 250w)In this paper, we present an overview of 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of the detailed function and anatomy of sensory areas of the human brain. We discuss the motivation for the studies, with particular emphasis on increasing the spatial resolution of functional MRI (fMRI) using reduced field-of-view (FOV) data acquisitions. MRI at ultra-high-field (UHF) -defined here as 7 T and above -has several advantages over lower field strengths. The intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the primary somatosensory cortex, we find no deviations from the homunculus model as shown previously in humans (Schluppeck 2017;Olman 2012;Kolasinski 2016;Shellekens 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the primary somatosensory cortex, we find no deviations from the homunculus model as shown previously in humans (Schluppeck 2017;Olman 2012;Kolasinski 2016;Shellekens 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Functional MRI signal changes in S1 show a linear arrangement of individual digits ( Fig. 1) as previously described in high-resolution fMRI (Olman 2012;Panchuelo 2016;Kolasinsky 2016;Schluppeck 2017;Siero 2014;Ejaz 2015). The distance between the representations of the thumb and the little finger in S1 is 16 ± 4 mm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Initially, neuroscientists were forced to use highly invasive methods to probe the mechanisms of sensation, which limited the applicability of such studies to humans. [1][2][3][4][5] More recently, advances in functional neuroimaging over the past several decades have opened new avenues for investigating sensation and perception non-invasively [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Because of its non-invasive nature and because of the wealth of fundamental knowledge derived from homologous systems in other mammals and from humans undergoing surgical procedures, functional imaging of sensory systems currently provides the best foundation for understanding the functional organization of the brain in healthy humans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the majority of UHF fMRI studies have used reduced field‐of‐view (FOV) 2D‐and 3D echo planar imaging (EPI) acquisitions to study chosen primary sensory areas, such as the visual and sensorimotor cortices (Fracasso, Luijten, Dumoulin, & Petridou, ; Puckett, Bollmann, Barth, & Cunnington, ; Reithler, Peters, & Goebel, ; Schluppeck, Sanchez‐Panchuelo, & Francis, ), thus overcoming a number of challenges of B 0 and B 1 inhomogeneities associated with larger FOV acquisitions (Polimeni, Renvall, Zaretskaya, & Fischl, ; Uludag & Blinder, ). For example, the increase in BOLD CNR of UHF experiments has been used to provide detailed maps of individual subjects’ visual (Goncalves et al, ; Kemper, De Martino, Emmerling, Yacoub, & Goebel, ; Poltoratski, Ling, McCormack, & Tong, ; Rua et al, ) and somatosensory functional responses (Puckett et al, ; Sanchez Panchuelo et al, ; Sanchez Panchuelo, Schluppeck, Harmer, Bowtell, & Francis, ) and how these relate to individual brain anatomy (Besle, Sanchez‐Panchuelo, Bowtell, Francis, & Schluppeck, ; Sanchez‐Panchuelo et al, ; Sanchez‐Panchuelo et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%