2003
DOI: 10.1002/jid.1030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring sustainable livelihoods approaches in relation to two interventions in Tanzania

Abstract: Bradford Scholars -how to deposit your paper Overview Copyright check• Check if your publisher allows submission to a repository.• Use the Sherpa RoMEO database if you are not sure about your publisher's position or email openaccess@bradford.ac.uk.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SLA became popular in terms of assessing poverty situations and providing a set of guiding principles that encapsulate the best way of planning, implementing and evaluating development initiatives at the ground level [1, 19,20]. However, whilst the SLA is effective in centralising people and their capabilities, it has not adequately addressed the significance of a cultural perspective in livelihood analysis [21][22][23][24][25][26]. An inadequate consideration of the cultural perspective oversimplifies not only people, but also their resourcefulness and capacities and, thus, the complexity and diversity of resource entitlement and livelihood opportunities.…”
Section: Culture and Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SLA became popular in terms of assessing poverty situations and providing a set of guiding principles that encapsulate the best way of planning, implementing and evaluating development initiatives at the ground level [1, 19,20]. However, whilst the SLA is effective in centralising people and their capabilities, it has not adequately addressed the significance of a cultural perspective in livelihood analysis [21][22][23][24][25][26]. An inadequate consideration of the cultural perspective oversimplifies not only people, but also their resourcefulness and capacities and, thus, the complexity and diversity of resource entitlement and livelihood opportunities.…”
Section: Culture and Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, in codifying complexity, SLA analyses often underplay the significance of macro‐level political economy. This both obscures understanding of the wider context of livelihoods and risks casting the poor as responsible for their own situations (Arce 2003; Murray 2002; Toner 2003). Second, SLA is criticised for its relative blindness to social relations within households and communities (Sneddon 2000).…”
Section: Youth and The Aids Pandemic In Southern Africa: The Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was substantially informed by the previous work of the authors. Anna Mdee has conducted extensive field research on agricultural livelihoods and natural resources governance in multiple locations in Tanzania since 1996 (Toner 2003;Cleaver and Toner 2006;Mdee 2017a, 2017b;Mdee 2017;Harrison and Mdee 2018;Mdee and Harrison 2019;Brockington et al 2019); Michael Chasukwa has researched and published on the political economy of agriculture and on local government capacity in Malawi since 2005 (Chinsinga and Chasukwa 2012Chinsinga, Chasukwa, and Zuka 2013), and Simon Manda has researched and published extensively on agriculture in Zambia, including a recent three year investigation of large scale land acquisition (Manda, Dougill, and Tallontire 2018a. We also reviewed the AFRINT survey data for each of the countries and worked in close co-operation with senior researchers from AFRINT country teams.…”
Section: Assessing Evidence For Inclusive Sustainable Intensificationmentioning
confidence: 99%