Exploring sustainable urban water governance: a case study of institutional capacity

Abstract

The sustainable urban water management system is likely to be characterised by complex and flexible governance arrangements, increased inter-organisational interaction and wide stakeholder participation, which contrasts significantly with the traditional approach. Recently there has been significant financial investment in urban water reform, however the reforms have not been as successful as anticipated and numerous institutional barriers remain. Understanding and assessing institutional capacity is central to addressing institutional impediments. Institutional capacity comprises individual, intra- and inter-organisational and external rules and incentives capacities. This paper reports on the first case study of a social research project that aims to develop an institutional capacity assessment framework. Empirical data from semi-structured interviews with 59 water industry experts in Sydney, Australia, and a broad literature survey were used. The key capacity attributes identified could form the basis of an institutional capacity assessment tool and reveal common and differing attributes across stakeholder groups which provide insight into stakeholder relations. Synthesis of the results revealed that intra- and inter-organisational capacities were facing particular challenges and should be explicitly addressed in reform, policy and capacity development initiatives.

Synergizing Toronto's Vision for Green Infrastructure Implementation and Prioritization: An Assessment of Guiding Environmental Documents Related to Green Infrastructure Implementation in the City of Toronto

“…Scholars and practitioners use governance in different ways but there is some agreement that complexity and uncertainty require more adaptive governance arrangements, an increase in interorganizational interaction and wide stakeholder participation -something that has not been characteristic of the conventional approach (van de Meene et al, 2009). In order to move towards an adaptive governance regime, governance needs to accommodate an adaptive transition for water resource management and this transition from path dependence to adaptive governance regimes requires a social learning process to occur as well.…”

Responding to change: lessons from water management for metropolitan governance

“…There has been a call for better integration of the urban water sector and engagement of the community (van de Meene, Brown, and Farrelly 2009); however, there are still significant institutional barriers to implementation including lack of institutional capacity, fragmentation of roles and responsibilities, lack of political will, and limited regulatory incentives (Brown, Sharp, and Ashley 2006;Keremane, McKay, and Wu 2017). Considering the increasing importance of liveability and the role of water as a vital element of health and wellbeing, there is a need for effective and accountable regional governance mechanisms for better environmental and social impact monitoring and control not only for metropolitan areas, but also regional water catchments (Spiller 2018).…”

A framework for assessing capacity in water governance

“…These elements range from technical tools to management practices to organizational relationships. [29] X X X X X X Cosío [30] X X de Loë et al [11] X X X X X Ivey et al [12] X X X Moore et al [6] X Robins [14] X Van de Meene et al [31] X X X X X X…”