2010
DOI: 10.1108/17554251011064837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring SWOT analysis – where are we now?

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the use of the strategic management tool, Strengths‐Weaknesses‐Opportunities‐Threats or SWOT analysis, and to assess how the methodology has been used as well as changes to the methodology. The findings both for and against SWOT analysis should lead to a balanced view of the technique as well as yield ideas for needed theory building.Design/methodology/approachUsing the ABInform Global® database, academic peer‐reviewed articles were compiled indicating SWOT as one… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
281
0
28

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 662 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
(147 reference statements)
0
281
0
28
Order By: Relevance
“…SWOT analysis was adopted because it has been commonly recognized as a useful tool for strategic planning and decision making (Helms & Nixon, 2010), specifically in education studies (Dyson, 2004;Hai & Tsou, 2009;Kuiper & Thomas, 2000;Lee, Lo, Leung, & Ko, 2000;Maiteny & Ison, 2000). The focus group discussion allowed us to formulate successful strategies or recommendations, after reviewing the strengths and weaknesses for success or risk factors identified by the PhD candidates, in the light of the threats and opportunities those factors present.…”
Section: Figure 2 the Two Focus Group Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SWOT analysis was adopted because it has been commonly recognized as a useful tool for strategic planning and decision making (Helms & Nixon, 2010), specifically in education studies (Dyson, 2004;Hai & Tsou, 2009;Kuiper & Thomas, 2000;Lee, Lo, Leung, & Ko, 2000;Maiteny & Ison, 2000). The focus group discussion allowed us to formulate successful strategies or recommendations, after reviewing the strengths and weaknesses for success or risk factors identified by the PhD candidates, in the light of the threats and opportunities those factors present.…”
Section: Figure 2 the Two Focus Group Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis consists on a systematic identification, classification, and quantification of a short list of UDCI referenced as urban factors impacting the conservation of cultural heritage and was carried out in three stages (a) Compilation of a list of UDCI from global urban indicator frameworks; (b) Semi-automated search for the UDCI within UNESCO SoC reports as factors affecting the conservation of WHC; and, (c) Systematic classification of identified urban factors as strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) to the conservation of WHC. The SWOT analysis helps to devise a strategic agenda by isolating key issues that need to be prioritized in furthering a suitable and sustainable approach to the management of urban resources [8,[54][55][56]. Thus, the analysis of UDCI referenced in UNESCO SoC reports is expected to identify global trends on the most common monitored synergies, pressing issues, and development approaches to the conservation of cultural heritage in the urban context.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El análisis DAFO (Helms & Nixon, 2010) es una técnica de evaluación diseñada en los años 60 ampliamente empleada en organizaciones de diversa índole para la evaluación de ideas previa a la toma de decisiones, analizar la situación de la organización frente al entorno y generar estrategias de desarrollo. Se sustenta sobre una matriz como la que se muestra en la Fig.…”
Section: El Análisis Dafounclassified