2014
DOI: 10.1111/cccr.12068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Alternative-Mainstream Dialectic: What “Alternative Media” Means to a Hybrid Audience

Abstract: This article enriches debates about “alternative media” by exploring what the term means to users through an audience survey (n = 224). Responses revealed values and practices that respondents agreed were important to alternative media. Users deemed a wide array of media “alternative”: political blogs, public broadcasting, foreign sources, and alternative‐press institutions, as well as The Daily Show, Facebook, Fox News, and The Huffington Post. Despite criticizing corporations and advertising, this audience c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
37
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…But, such caveats notwithstanding, the voices of the audience members taking part in this study do now provide us with empirical evidence to support many of the conceptual arguments found within the literature on alternative journalism and do reinforce the findings of the limited number of earlier audience studies. Members of the audience in this study do indeed seem to be prompted to read the Leeds Citizen because of their dissatisfaction with much mainstream media and because the site's alternative approach to journalism helps them make sense of the world and provides them with useful information, as Rauch (2015) and Ewart et al (2005) found in the US and Australian contexts respectively. This study has also found evidence to support arguments that engagement with alternative journalism can be seen as facilitating forms of "public conversation" (Meadows, 2013) and as simultaneously prompting, reinforcing and reflecting readers' active democratic engagement as citizens (Boyle and Schmierbach, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…But, such caveats notwithstanding, the voices of the audience members taking part in this study do now provide us with empirical evidence to support many of the conceptual arguments found within the literature on alternative journalism and do reinforce the findings of the limited number of earlier audience studies. Members of the audience in this study do indeed seem to be prompted to read the Leeds Citizen because of their dissatisfaction with much mainstream media and because the site's alternative approach to journalism helps them make sense of the world and provides them with useful information, as Rauch (2015) and Ewart et al (2005) found in the US and Australian contexts respectively. This study has also found evidence to support arguments that engagement with alternative journalism can be seen as facilitating forms of "public conversation" (Meadows, 2013) and as simultaneously prompting, reinforcing and reflecting readers' active democratic engagement as citizens (Boyle and Schmierbach, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…More recently, Jennifer Rauch (2015) conducted a survey of more than 200 people who identified themselves as being "alternative media users". Interestingly, those completing her questionnaire included some who considered Fox News, the Huffington Post and National Public Radio to be alternative, alongside more commonly accepted outlets such as The Nation, Alternet and Mother Jones (Rauch, 2015: 131).…”
Section: Literature Review: 'A Huge Gap In Our Research Knowledge'mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quanto ao género, a divisão da nossa amostra apresenta uma distribuição representativa da população ativa portuguesa que, segundo dados de 2014, obtidos pela consulta da POR-DATA, está percentualmente dividida em 51,3% homens e 48,7% de mulheres (PORDATA, 2014 …”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…There is no generally accepted definition of what exactly constitutes an alternative (media) source (Rauch, 2015;Schweiger, 2017). Categorizations vary strongly dependent on whether one evaluates content (e.g., politically balanced vs. slanted), production standards (e.g., meeting journalistic standards), producers (e.g., paid journalists vs. voluntary users), business models (e.g., profit-orientation), audiences (e.g., size or composition), or audience perceptions of the sources.…”
Section: Source Categorization and Party Messagesmentioning
confidence: 99%